AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alfred Yen

MATHM02 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn the math independently; clarity is the main reported problem.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to FollowDifficult MathSparse FeedbackLow Clarity
  • Only one short review exists.
  • Students find him difficult to understand.
  • Course difficulty is rated high with low teaching quality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

High difficulty and poor clarity suggest earning a strong grade requires heavy independent effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The only review rates difficulty high and focuses on comprehension problems.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

comment.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Quality is low and the only student note is that he is hard to understand.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, so fairness cannot be confirmed either way.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described beyond overall difficulty.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The sole .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and elevated difficulty with almost no other detail.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Difficult to understand.”
MATHM02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

“Difficult to understand.”
MATHM02

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Difficult to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with very limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🔇 Low Clarity

25/100

“Difficult to understand.”

📉 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Difficult to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Difficult to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • Difficult to understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one brief 2010 review exists, so conclusions rest on minimal evidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHM021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values