AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ndiaye Madjiguene

MATH18 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the only available review calls the teaching unusable.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot TeachAvoid ClassHigh DifficultyZero Learning
  • The only review is extremely negative.
  • Student says she cannot teach regardless of student ability.
  • Quality is rated 1 with maximum difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The only student says no amount of ability helps because teaching fails completely.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty is maxed out and the review frames the class as impossible to learn from.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only review .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

No grade recovery path is mentioned amid an overall nightmare experience report.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

High difficulty with zero .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Student states she is not a teacher and cannot teach anything.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review paints the class as a teaching failure with extreme difficulty and no learning payoff.

Main concern

Students may learn nothing despite effort or prior ability.

What students said

“Horrible! ! not a teacher! im telling you, no matter how smart you are she cant teach you anything!”
MATH18

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; only overall teaching failure is documented.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

to avoid the class.

“Horrible! ! not a teacher!”
MATH18

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible! ! not a teacher! im telling you, no matter how smart you are she cant teach you anything!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 highly negative in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

5/100

“Horrible! !”

📉 Teaching Quality

10/100

“not a teacher! im telling you, no matter how smart you are she cant teach you anything!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not a teacher!
  • she cant teach you anything!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Taking the Class

  • Horrible! !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

A single strongly negative 2010 review is too thin for high confidence but clearly signals risk.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values