AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

MB Leerabhandh

CHEMIM12 · CHEM12 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option and are ready for a very hard, poorly explained chemistry load.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to understandUnhelpfulHeavy workloadHard to get an A
  • Students rate teaching quality very low and say a strong accent makes chemistry harder.
  • Intro chem is described as , and labs.
  • Getting an A is portrayed as extremely difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Student says it is so hard to get an A that the .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and the subject is described as .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students call the professor horrible and say the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Getting an A is described as extremely hard despite heavy required work.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; no online reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students cite piles of tests, quizzes, and labs even for an introductory class.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews say she is not helpful and a strong accent makes hard material harder to follow.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Students emphasize many tests and quizzes along with labs as the main burden.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person intro chemistry is called horrible, , and overloaded with tests, quizzes, and labs.

Main concern

Accent plus unhelpful teaching and crushing workload make an A feel out of reach.

What students said

“Horrible professor. She had a very strong accent, which made a difficult subject even more difficult to understand.”
CHEMIM12
“SO hard to get an A in this class. and quizzes and labs”
CHEM12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment load is heavy with many tests, quizzes, and labs; friendliness is not supported.

Frequent TestsQuizzesLabsIn-Person Assessments

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and labs with high difficulty.

Frequent TestsQuizzesLabs
“ and quizzes and labs you have to do for an introductory class”
CHEM12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible professor. She had a very strong accent, which made a difficult subject even more difficult to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting clarity problems and crushing intro chem load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Horrible professor. .”

🅰️ Hard to Get an A

10/100

“SO hard to get an A in this class.”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

15/100

“ and quizzes and labs you have to do for an introductory class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible professor.
  • She had a very strong accent, which made a difficult subject even more difficult to understand.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • SO hard to get an A in this class.
  • and quizzes and labs you have to do for an introductory class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent negative reviews from 2010 give a but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM121 review
CHEMIM121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values