AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Shara Chess

NS3 · NS03 · NURSNS3 · NURSISECT · NSMO4 · NURSI3 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want rigorous nursing preparation and can meet high professional standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent nursing instructorHigh standardsClinical excellenceAccessible mentorKnowledge-first
  • Students praise her as an outstanding nursing theory and .
  • She has high standards and expects independence, so this is not a free A.
  • She is described as , and professionally demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

High standards and professional expectations mean an A requires real nursing effort, not minimal work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Nursing content is serious and clinical, but strong teaching makes it .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , though clinical and theory engagement are clearly expected.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

and practical learning, with only one dissenting voice.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

High standards and competence focus suggest fair but demanding .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students imply substantial responsibility and clinical readiness work without calling the load overwhelming.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Reviews emphasize excellent clinical and , and accessibility.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on clinical competence and homework system.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person nursing students mostly call her an excellent clinical and theory instructor with high standards and strong support, with only one clearly negative review.

Main concern

Expect responsibility and hard clinical standards rather than hand-holding.

What students said

“The .”
NS3
“She has high standards and is extremely knowledgeable.”
NSMO4
“She expects us to take SOME responsibility in doing the work w/o hand-holding us through the assignments!”
NURSI3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person nursing reviews emphasize clinical and theory instruction but do .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting clinical excellence, high standards, and limited sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She was the only teacher .”

🏥 Clinical Standards

80/100

“She will shape you into a competent, professional RN who looks at the whole picture.”

📞 Accessibility

84/100

“She gives out her home phone, and her cell phone; and .”

⚠️ One Dissent

30/100

“does not willing to help students, tries to make student confuse and hard time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • excellent clinical and theory instructor
  • Always answered questions brilliantly
  • you learn practical information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Standards

  • She has high standards and is extremely knowledgeable
  • not competent.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and their patients
  • Feel lucky to have had her
  • She is such a great RN

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

; they are detailed and mostly positive, but the small sample limits confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NS031 review
NS31 review
NSMO41 review
NURSI31 review
NURSISECT1 review
Show 1 more courses
NURSNS31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values