AI Rate Professor

English

Deborah Dixon

ALRIGHT · ENGLISHM01 · ENG1A · ENGM01C · ENGLMO1B · ENGM02B · ENGL1C · ENGM01A · ENGMO1C · ENGLISH1B · ENG1B · ENGLISHM01C · ENGMO1B · ENG · ENGLM01B · ENGM01B · ENG1C · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want intense literary analysis writing practice and can handle a heavy, polarizing workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy essay loadVampire-themed classesHard graderPolarizing styleUniversity prep intensity
  • some call her brilliant and and unfair.
  • Expect , and long finals like a 20-page paper.
  • Attendance and favorites complaints appear often enough to raise risk for casual writers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students describe tons of essays and , so an A requires sustained high effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

27/100

, and frequent long papers make the content intellectually demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple and roll is taken seriously.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Negative avoid warnings outnumber enthusiastic recommendations, especially for students seeking easier English credit.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many call her a hard or and high essay standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly , and very long finals.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some love her critical-thinking depth and help when asked, while .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Papers, research essays, bibliographies, and presentations dominate, with some essay exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English sections demand heavy writing and critical analysis; fans praise rigor while critics report confusion, favorites, and burnout.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ !!! ... Save Yourselves!!! !!!”
ENGMO1B
“She is an amazing teacher and thinks outside the box.”
ENGM01A
“4 words sum it up: WAY TOO MUCH WORK!”
ENGM01C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essay exams rather than proctored multiple-choice testing.

Essay examsLong final papersFrequent research essays

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and long paper finals; proctoring software is not mentioned.

Essay exams20-page final paperWeekly essays
“ and graded fairley.”
ENG1C
“she gives u a 20 page final at the end of the semester.”
ENGLM01B
“ and the final is a 20 page paper.”
ENGLMO1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! I love english class but dreaded going to this one twice a week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 in-person English reviews, highlighting workload, fairness, and polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Workload Intensity

18/100

“4 words sum it up: WAY TOO MUCH WORK!”

👍 For Motivated Writers

70/100

“If you want to be prepared for a University... .”

🚫 Overall Recommendation

34/100

“i am warning you, save yourself a lot of stress, and .”

Theme 1

🧛 About Themes & Style

  • Her vampire class is awesome.
  • the whole class is based on Silas Marner
  • if u don't like Buffy the Vampire slayer, she won't like you!

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Load

  • and the final is a 20 page paper.
  • There is so and lots of reading.
  • WAY TOO MUCH WORK!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • She seems like she is unfair, because she will give you a grade and
  • VERY UNFAIR TEACHER.
  • ..lots of pointless work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four in-person reviews over several years show consistent themes of heavy writing and polarized quality despite older dates.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENGM01C7 reviews
ENG1B4 reviews
ENGLISH1B3 reviews
ENGLM01B3 reviews
ENGMO1B3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGMO1C2 reviews
ALRIGHT1 review
ENG1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGL1C1 review
ENGLISHM011 review
ENGLISHM01C1 review
ENGLMO1B1 review
ENGM01A1 review
ENGM01B1 review
ENGM02B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values