AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Maeretha Franklin

HSM19 · HIMM02 · HIMM01 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; and unreliable grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachOverwhelming WorkloadWrong Exam KeysUnresponsiveComputer Illiterate
  • Students say and mispronounces key terms.
  • , and presentations.
  • and email non-response appear repeatedly across courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Harsh, error-prone exams and crushing weekly work make a clean A feel unrealistic.

; no online review count.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students report extreme volume of material, weekly tests, and content that is poorly taught.

; no online review count.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, but the load forces constant engagement.

; no online review count.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Nearly every review warns not to take her and .

; no online review count.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Students report correct answers marked wrong and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-flagged reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Weekly , and oral presentations stack up.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-flagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as , and failing basic course logistics.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-flagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly tests and and presentations.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-flagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Reviews labeled in-person still describe chaotic instruction, massive homework, and .

Main concern

, and almost no real teaching.

What students said

“Does not even teach. She reads directly out of the book and does not evaluate... Assigns UNBELIEVABLE amounts of work. .”
HSM19
“Made . Marked right answers wrong...”
HSM19
“Out of 34 students, 8 left on the class. What a joke!”
HIMM02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

mistakes, and unforgiving grading.

Weekly TestsQuiz ErrorsNo Answer KeysWrong Marking

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-flagged and no useful review.

Weekly TestsWrong Exam KeysNo Quiz Answers Released
“Made . Marked right answers wrong...”
HSM19
“Does and a lot of her answers to the .”
HIMM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not even teach. She reads directly out of the book... Assigns UNBELIEVABLE amounts of work. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 consistently negative reviews focused on teaching failure, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Did not teach, simply read off the page numbers of the chapters and talked about her experience in the medical field which did not apply to the tests.”

📚 Workload Overload

8/100

“This class has taken over my life!!This lady gives out an unbelievable amount of work.”

🧪

16/100

“Made . Marked right answers wrong...”

👎 Recommendation

6/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not even teach. She reads directly out of the book
  • Knows nothing!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • Assigns UNBELIEVABLE amounts of work
  • , and 2 oral presentations
  • Incredible amount of information to learn in such a short period of time.

Theme 3

💻 About Tech & Communication

  • because she does not
  • she didn't know how to use WebCT
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight highly consistent negative reviews from early 2010 with detailed workload and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HSM194 reviews
HIMM012 reviews
HIMM022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values