AI Rate Professor

Biology

Dr. Mark Flannery

ANAT01 · ANATM01A · ANATMO1 · ANATM01 · ANAT1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will study consistently for a tough anatomy course with fair support and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExpectationsExtra CreditNo Textbook NeededDaily QuizzesKnowledgeable
  • Students praise clear expectations, strong lectures, and .
  • Anatomy is still hard memorization work, but quizzes and large help grades.
  • No textbook required; his slides and notes are enough for most students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and , but anatomy still requires steady memorization work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students say the content is university-level with a lot of material to memorize.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

because tests and quizzes track what he teaches in class.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

, and real learning, with many saying they would take him again.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Frequent quizzes and substantial make grades more recoverable despite hard content.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but and heavy memorization keep the workload real.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and very helpful.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and lab tests dominate; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person anatomy is demanding but well taught, with , and generous .

Main concern

Heavy memorization load .

What students said

“there are no surprises,he tests on what .”
ANATM01
“Don't buy the book, his notes are enough.”
ANATM01
“He allows . .”
ANAT01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams closely follow his slides and stated topics, with available.

Daily QuizzesLecture TestsLab TestsTests Match LecturesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

covers and uses frequent quizzes plus lecture and lab exams.

Daily QuizzesTests Match LecturesLab and Lecture Exams
“ on.”
ANATM01
“ ! though....”
ANATMO1
“ and lecture tests, around 18 .”
ANAT01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Mark is fantastic. . there are no surprises,he tests on what .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person , and fair grading support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“I thoroughly enjoyed Dr. Mark's class. I learned SO much in his class”

📚 Workload & Study

48/100

“This is a difficult course lots of study time needed to memorize.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows and enjoys teaching this subject.
  • he likes to go off on tangents.
  • Dr. Mark really knows the material and is excited to teah it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of .
  • !
  • Teaches at University level, way too much information for a CC level course.

Theme 3

📘 About Materials

  • Don't buy the book, his notes are enough.
  • he doesn't use or require a book, everything is done off of his lecture/powepoints.
  • He only requires the lab book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine consistent, detailed in-person reviews from 2007-2009 strongly agree on teaching quality and course structure.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANATM014 reviews
ANATMO12 reviews
ANAT011 review
ANAT11 review
ANATM01A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values