AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Teresa Palmisano

PEPECK · PECK · PEM16 · PEM15 · PHYSM15 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a real PE workout that improves fitness and will push you without shaming beginners.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKiller WorkoutsCaring CoachVaried Cardio MixTough But FairFitness Results
  • Workouts are intense and varied across kickboxing, cardio, core, and strength.
  • She paces with out-of-shape students and keeps class interesting.
  • ; missing more than a few classes is risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

PE grades track participation and effort more than a free A; tough workouts still reward consistent show-up.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Cardio kickboxing is physically demanding with bleachers, circuits, and high rep work, not a sit-down class.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students warn not to miss more than about four classes, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students love the results and variety, with only a minority calling her unprepared or too harsh.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and ; no free A narrative.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

In-class killer workouts are the load; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students praise variety, care for individuals, and real fitness gains despite one harsh outlier.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is participation and in-class workouts rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and strength with tough but adaptable pacing.

Main concern

Workouts can feel brutal and one early review alleged no-shows and extreme jump-rope volume.

What students said

“Teresa likes to incorporate different workouts so the class stays interesting throughout the semester.”
PEPECK
“Don't miss more than 4 classes. She's cool.”
PEM15
“Keep in mind she is tough but that made me work harder and in the end I improved with my fitness.”
PEM16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe PE workouts and .

Participation BasedNo Formal Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; success is framed around workouts and attendance.

Participation BasedAttendance Limits
“Don't miss more than 4 classes. She's cool.”
PEM15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I liked the class! We had killer workouts and Teresa made it interesting and fun for all the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting fitness intensity and care. Credibility rating: Medium.

💪 Workout Intensity

48/100

“It's called CARDIO kick boxing for a reason. You will run bleachers one day and spend the next doing tons of ab and arm work.”

❤️ Student Care

80/100

“She was very concerned for you as an individual and she did not hold it against you if you were out-of-shape.”

👍

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

🏋️ About Workouts

  • We worked on cardio, kickboxing, circut training, core, strength training
  • killer workouts and Teresa made it interesting
  • very little kickboxing and a LOT of cardio

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Teresa you rock!
  • She goes the extra mile and is a little tough
  • she will not make you feel bad if you need to slow it down

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but decade-old in-person reviews show mostly consistent praise with one strong negative.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PEM152 reviews
PEM162 reviews
PECK1 review
PEPECK1 review
PHYSM151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values