AI Rate Professor

Economics

Peter Gucciardo

ECON1 · MACROECON · MO2 · ECONM02 · ECONMO1 · ECONM01A · ECONMICRO · ECON2 · ECOMMO2 · ECON211 · ECON3592 · ECONMACRO · BUSECONOM · ENG101 · ECONM01 · BUSECON · MACRO · ECONM01M02 · ECONOMICS · ECON · ECONMACR · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid if possible; as a last resort if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerImpossible ExamsUnhelpfulOutdated MaterialsHarsh GraderSelf-Taught Course
  • Vast majority of students call him one of the worst economics teachers they have had.
  • as extremely hard and poorly aligned with lectures or homework.
  • Workload can pile up with many papers while support and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly report hard C or F outcomes even after heavy study and full assignment completion.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

High difficulty ratings and as brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

; some note lateness, early dismissal, or video formats.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Nearly all detailed reviews urge students to run and pick another economics professor.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and many report low grades despite heavy effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent multi-page papers, dense chapter tests, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Lectures, videos, and as unhelpful, outdated, or demeaning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and , and lectures.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and video/telecourse econ sections dominate with , and .

Main concern

and disconnected from what is taught or assigned.

What students said

“ . , and does not make sense.”
ECONM02
“This was THE !”
ECONM02
“Practically everyone failed the first test, and .”
ECONMO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and disconnected from taught material.

Extremely Hard TestsMisaligned ExamsHeavy Paper LoadNo Curve Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and video sections report extremely hard tests that .

Extremely Hard TestsMisaligned ExamsTricky Wording
“ and there is no structure in the class.”
ECONM02
“the study guide that was given to us had nothing to do with what was on the test!”
MACROECON
“the .”
ECON211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If good grades and transfering are important !!!! WROST TEACHER, his tests were impossible!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 in-person reviews with and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

10/100

“Run Forest, Run! .... This guy is no good!”

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He is by far the .”

🧱 Impossible Exams

12/100

“ .”

📚

22/100

“The for you.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is very hard to get above a C
  • i got a F! i've never had an F!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were terrible
  • Doesn't return emails
  • he doesn't know how to teach

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • Everything he dicussed during class, was never on the tests
  • plays favorites

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

41 reviews over many years show and poor teaching, with only a few outliers.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 525

Course coverage

ECONM026 reviews
ECON5 reviews
ECONM015 reviews
ECON13 reviews
ECONOMICS3 reviews
Show 16 more courses
ECON22 reviews
ECONMACRO2 reviews
MACRO2 reviews
BUSECON1 review
BUSECONOM1 review
ECOMMO21 review
ECON2111 review
ECON35921 review
ECONM01A1 review
ECONM01M021 review
ECONMACR1 review
ECONMICRO1 review
ECONMO11 review
ENG1011 review
MACROECON1 review
MO21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values