AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Mia Bortolussi

GRA21 · GRM23 · MM10 · MULTIMEDI · PHOTOGRA · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want a and do not need advanced depth.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCreative FreedomPhotoshop ProEasy ProjectsShow-and-Tell StylePatient Mentor
  • Strong creative freedom and real design software knowledge, especially Photoshop.
  • Content is intro-level and often feels easy or already familiar.
  • Some students find lectures slow, show-and-tell heavy, and not advanced enough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say she is easy and you cannot fail if .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Courses give fundamentals and creative exploration rather than advanced or fast-paced theory.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and skill, while a few call the class boring or slow.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Fair and if ; failure is rare for engaged students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload centers on creative projects and software practice rather than heavy theory drills.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Knowledgeable and patient about design tools, though some find lectures long or too elementary.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears project- and creativity-driven with little mention of formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and supportive, with strong software tips, but pace and depth can feel basic or boring for experienced students.

Main concern

Advanced students may find too much show-and-tell and little new material.

What students said

“she is a really easy teacher. ..”
GRA21
“if you do your work you can't fail”
GRM23
“everything she teaches, we already knew prior to the class, so it's utterly boring and pointless.”
PHOTOGRA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and instead emphasize projects and creative work.

Project-focusedLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and creative output more than formal exams.

Creative projectsSoftware assignments
“if you do your work you can't fail”
GRM23
“really had a chance to be creative”
MM10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mia is amazing and passionate about her field. and if you do your work you can't fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting creativity, easiness, and depth concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Creative Teaching

70/100

“ , and open. She allows the creative mind to explore anywhere”

👍 Easy Course Load

82/100

“she is a really easy teacher. ..”

😐 Depth Concerns

40/100

“everything she teaches, we already knew prior to the class, so it's utterly boring and pointless.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she have a lot of knowledge on photoshop
  • She gives input from her design experiences
  • does entirely too much show and tell

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she is a really easy teacher
  • if you do your work you can't fail
  • nothing too advanced was learned

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2006-2009 give a but are old and lack grade or .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GRM232 reviews
MM102 reviews
GRA211 review
MULTIMEDI1 review
PHOTOGRA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values