AI Rate Professor

English

Steven Camacho

ENGC1000 · ENG1B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and will follow his exact thesis format carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring InstructorClear CriteriaExtra CreditTough GraderPaper Heavy
  • , and real writing growth online.
  • One strong dissent calls grading rigid around an exact thesis formula.
  • Expect , and effort; many still earn As and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn As with effort and , but and strict thesis rules block free As.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with , and transfer-level skill building.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

while others do not; communication can unlock flexibility.

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Five of six would take him again for care and .

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria and help, but and rigid thesis rules can cut points.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple papers, labs, and .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most call him caring, helpful, and strong on lectures and .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, labs, and writing assignments dominate rather than traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and growth-focused for most students, with and flexibility when life happens.

Main concern

Rigid thesis phrasing and if you write outside his preferred style.

What students said

“I think I am a better writer because of him. if I could.”
ENGC1000
“he would only give me half the points because I didn't start my thesis statement with "I argue"”
ENGC1000

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and writing assignments more than proctored exams; .

Paper-Heavy WritingExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online , and rather than webcam or Lockdown Browser exams.

Paper-Heavy WritingExtra CreditClear Grading Criteria
“ . He is also really helpful when you reach out to him.”
ENGC1000
“For many of my assignments and points because I didn't start my thesis statement with "I argue"”
ENGC1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Camacho was a great instructor. I learned a lot and I am excited to progress in my college journey. I think I am a better writer because of him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 online reviews, highlighting care, writing rigor, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

78/100

“ and caring”

📝 Rigid Thesis Rules

48/100

“he would only give me half the points because I didn't start my thesis statement with "I argue"”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Camacho helped me out so much
  • and caring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • If somethings comes up let him know and he will work with you
  • As long as your trying you will be ok
  • if I could

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent online reviews with mostly consistent praise plus one detailed negative outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGC10005 reviews
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1