AI Rate Professor

Communication

August Benassi

COMMUNICATIONS · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; reviews , and a fail-you tone online and in person.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderZero for MistakesUnhelpful FeedbackHarsh CommunicationAvoid at All Costs
  • Students call this the and report automatic zeros for mistakes
  • and support feels absent even when students work hard
  • Grades cluster at D, F, drop, or uncertain with

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students report automatic zeros, D and F grades, and failure despite maximum effort.

Online reviews dominate with zeros and F grades; the one In person review also reports failure risk.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Material is called challenging with , and relentless difficulty ratings of 5.

Both Online and In person reviews rate difficulty at the maximum.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

while one online and one in-person mark it optional.

; the In person review listed attendance as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero would-take-again interest; students call it the and .

Negative recommendation is consistent across Online and In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Mistakes trigger full zeros and .

Format shift

and In person comments.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Lots of , and many papers.

Format shift

Workload complaints come mainly from Online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

One- or , and a sense he will not help students.

Format shift

Awful teaching tone is consistent Online and In person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

heavy papers and reading.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

he wants students to fail.

Main concern

Unhelpful instruction paired with .

What students said

“Terribly unhelpful. Feels like he wants you to fail.”
communications

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online communications sections draw consistent 1/5 ratings with zeros for mistakes, harsh tone, and heavy papers.

Main concern

, and little support despite hard work.

What students said

“Almost any mistake you make on an assignment, he will automatically give you a zero for that .”
communications
“This is genuinely the entire life.”
communications
“HORRIBLE and .”
communications

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize punitive grading and harsh .

Tough GradingAssignment ZerosHeavy Papers

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unhelpful instruction without exam format details.

Tough Grader
“Terribly unhelpful. Feels like he wants you to fail.”
communications

Online

Online but describe automatic zeros and .

Assignment ZerosTough GraderSo Many Papers
“Almost any mistake you make on an assignment, he will automatically give you a zero for that .”
communications

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is genuinely the entire life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (4 online, 1 in and poor support. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Overall Experience

8/100

“This is genuinely the entire life.”

⚖️

5/100

“Almost any mistake you make on an assignment, he will automatically give you a zero for that .”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“HORRIBLE and .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • automatically give you a zero for that entire assignment
  • Feels like he wants you to fail

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he will not help you and fail you no matter how hard you try

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews across online and and poor support.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

communications5 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1