AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jeff Bajah

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can meet every early deadline perfectly and do not expect flexibility for emergencies.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo emergency flexibilityStrict deadlinesAI-generated assignmentsLots of homeworkClear grading criteria
  • Multiple students dropped for missing early intro video with no sympathy for emergencies or tech issues
  • and deadline-driven work with late penalties
  • fair if on time, harsh when life issues intervene

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible if everything is on time, but , and .

All evidence is from Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is not hard for most, but volume of reading and strict deadlines add friction.

All evidence is from Online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, yet intro video and participation gates act as hard requirements.

All evidence is from Online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only one of ; , and low engagement.

All evidence is from Online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and little flexibility when intro video or deadlines are missed.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; one student found him fair if fully on time.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of reading, discussion posts that close same day, and .

Format shift

All evidence from Online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Low engagement, AI-generated assignments, and harsh handling of emergencies dominate student feedback.

Format shift

One if work is timely.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Graded by few things including intro video, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Fully online econ with rigid intro-video gates, lots of reading and , and low sympathy for tech or medical emergencies.

Main concern

or Canvas tech issues.

What students said

“Had a Medical emergency with little brother and messaged him about a 1 minute self introduction video i couldn't complete due to my situation and he dropped me anyways.”
24490
“This guy is teaching at Mt. SAC. He has used AI for the creation of most of his assignments”
24490

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and deadline penalties rather than proctored exams.

Discussion postsDeadline-drivenClear grading criteriaNo proctoring details reported

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online work centers on intro video, reading, and ; no webcam or Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Mandatory intro videoDiscussion postsLate work penaltiesClear grading criteria
“ if you struggle with , and late work gets 10–20% off.”
24490
“He is a if you do everything on time.”
24490

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Had a Medical emergency with little brother and messaged him about a 1 minute self introduction video i couldn't complete due to my situation and he dropped me anyways.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 Online reviews, highlighting deadline rigidity, workload, and AI-assignment concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Flexibility Risk

15/100

“he dropped me anyways. because this shows if you have a serious emergency that comes first before school he will not give any sympathy”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“It wasn't hard, just a lot of reading and work.”

🤖 Teaching Depth Concern

30/100

“you shouldn't be paying for professor GPT when there's so many other professors who are willing to dive deeper into the topic with you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not very engaging, aside from TED Talks.
  • He has used AI for the creation of most of his assignments
  • you shouldn't be paying for professor GPT

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a if you do everything on time.
  • late work gets 10–20% off.
  • It wasn't hard, just a lot of reading and work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Flexibility

  • he dropped me anyways.
  • he did not even try to understand what happened and dropped me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five Online reviews across one course show consistent deadline rigidity and mixed grades with moderate detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

244905 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1