AI Rate Professor

Engineering & Math

Ted Lee

ENGR25 · ENGR22 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle a demanding, self-directed engineering course with inconsistent support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teachingTough gradingHeavy labsSupport variesSelf-taught workload
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him supportive in ENGR25 and students who found him rude or unhelpful.
  • Many negative , and a self-taught class experience.
  • Online ENGR25 reviews are strongly positive but only represent two reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but , and needing to self-teach.

Online evidence is positive but limited, while effort and frustration.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Engineering and MATLAB content is repeatedly described as , and .

Online students found the material clearer, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, and class control issues, but do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly establish a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because many students describe rude treatment, poor help, and unnecessary stress despite some strong ENGR25 praise.

Online reviewers recommend him, while and often strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments frequently call him a though several students still report A grades.

Format shift

Online reviews , while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe lots of , and stressful deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews describe useful work, while in-person ENGR22 reviews emphasize heavy and unfair workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is polarized, but repeated comments about rudeness, poor help, and self-teaching outweigh the praise.

Format shift

Online reviews describe clear support, while and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and occasional quizzes more than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly describe labs, assignments, projects, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many students calling him rude or unhelpful while others praise ENGR25 labs and feedback.

Main concern

Students often report tough grading, heavy work, and .

What students said

“rlly wouldn't bother taking him.”
ENGR22
“Professor Lee is one of the .”
ENGR25
“He does not help us at all.”
ENGR25

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive and describe clear, supportive teaching in ENGR25.

Main concern

The online sample is small and both reviews still rate difficulty as high.

What students said

“Professor Lee is an , and incredibly supportive.”
ENGR25
“Engr25 was one of the most fun and useful classes I've taken at Chabot.”
ENGR25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention mini quizzes and midterms but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or a .

Mini QuizzesMidterms MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms, but do not clearly prove book rules or .

Mini QuizzesMidterms Mentioned
“mini Quizes and midterms”
ENGR25

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“rlly wouldn't bother taking him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“he didn't even teach us and the class was highly self taught.”

⚖️

28/100

“Ted Lee is a terrible teacher! Don't bother taking him!”

👍 Recommendation Split

38/100

“Professor Lee is one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he didn't even teach us and the class was highly self taught.
  • Professor Lee is one of the .
  • I left that ...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • nothing is good enough for him.
  • This professor made the class unnecessarily stressful, especially for a fast-paced summer engineering course.
  • Although His Engineering 25 class was tough as duck, I had a Blast All semester

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • , and helped build my confidence in engineering!
  • he would be extremely rude to be and is very condescending.
  • and office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen recent reviews across online and , though the tone is unusually polarized.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENGR2512 reviews
ENGR226 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values