AI Rate Professor

Geography

Daniel Sherrill

GEOLAB1 · GEO1LAB · GEOLECTURE · GEO1L · GEO5 · GELOLAB1 · GEOG1L · GEO1 · GEOGL002 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
29.41%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you are ready for a and heavy self-study.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard examsUnclear lecturesTough gradingMandatory attendanceSelf-study required
  • Most students describe the class as very difficult, test-heavy, and poorly explained.
  • Several reviews say lectures are confusing, fast, or .
  • A few students find him funny or caring, but the unless you can study independently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A requires heavy studying and persistence because , and many students struggle.

Online reviews show few grade opportunities and Proctorio in one class, while and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students describe complicated , and exams with specific questions.

Both formats are difficult, with and hard exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and several reviews imply participation or class presence matters.

, while online attendance rules are not clearly proven.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and help is limited.

Both formats are mostly negative, though a few in-person students liked his personality or found him caring.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students frequently call him a tough grader and say grades .

Format shift

Online reviews describe few grade opportunities, while and grading.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report , and long or difficult exams.

Format shift

Online workload centers on reading and quizzes, while , and frequent tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most , though a few students praise his humor and care.

Format shift

Online reviews call lectures unhelpful and systems unclear, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades , and few major grade items.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams, while , and hard tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe , and poor support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures do not prepare them for .

What students said

“the .”
GEOLAB1
“ but barely helps your grade.”
GELOLAB1
“ and are extremely hard”
GEOGL002

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe unclear , and one explicit Proctorio requirement.

Main concern

, and strict proctoring in one review.

What students said

“all of my grades were only 5 quizzes, no assignments, and no opportunities.”
GEO5
“You have to really study though.”
GEO1
“he makes you install Proctorio.”
GEO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews cite hard tests, no notes in one in-person class, Proctorio online, and .

No Notes During TestHard ExamsProctorioTest HeavyFew Grade Items

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in one class, chapter quizzes, midterms, and a final.

No Notes During TestHard ExamsMini QuizzesMidtermsFinal
“he does not allow notes during the test.”
GEO1
“the .”
GEOLAB1
“ .”
GEOLECTURE

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Proctorio in one course and a grade , and .

ProctorioFew Grade ItemsQuizzes And Exams
“he makes you install Proctorio.”
GEO1
“all of my grades were only 5 quizzes, no assignments, and no opportunities.”
GEO5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ but barely helps your grade.”

🧪

20/100

“ and are extremely hard”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are long, boring, and hard to understand.
  • He doesn't even try to give quality, in-depth lectures.
  • his lectures are straight to the point and he cares about his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • all of my grades were only 5 quizzes, no assignments, and no opportunities.
  • and are extremely hard

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • he does not allow notes during the test.
  • he makes you install Proctorio.
  • Some of those questions were on the exam.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years and both formats are detailed and and weak instruction.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

GEO14 reviews
GELOLAB12 reviews
GEO1L2 reviews
GEO1LAB2 reviews
GEOG1L2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
GEOLAB12 reviews
GEO51 review
GEOGL0021 review
GEOLECTURE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3