AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Juliana Vieira

ENSC10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and very strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderOverwhelming workloadPoor communicationChanging rulesPassive-aggressive
  • Students consistently describe the course as much harder than expected for environmental science.
  • Workload is heavy, with , and presentations.
  • Reviews , and harsh grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because students report , and heavy work even when earning mid-level grades.

and heavy work, with online evidence coming from only one review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

The , but students say the professor makes it difficult, boring, and assignment-heavy.

course feels harder than expected; the online review mainly shows workload pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews , but the online review shows strict first-day participation consequences.

Online evidence suggests strict early engagement, while rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students strongly discourage taking the class because of , and attitude concerns.

Both online and in-person comments are negative, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Multiple reviews call her a and describe high standards with .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, but .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students report , and presentations.

Format shift

The online review reports heavy work immediately, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Reviews describe poor communication, passive-aggressive , and no student support.

Format shift

; the online review focuses more on workload and course management.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize projects, labs, discussions, sketches, presentations, and assignments more than exams.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions assignments and test-heavy tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe harsh , and difficult communication.

Main concern

.

What students said

“The workload is awful, expect to draw 3 sketches, practically an , and a presentation or debate for the week.”
ENSC-10
“She's constantly changing the and expects us to be okay with it.”
ENSC-10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports immediate heavy work and being dropped .

Main concern

Heavy early workload and strict course management.

What students said

“there was 2 assignments due on the first day and because I only did one out of two, she dropped me”
ENSC-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , though one online tag marks the class as test-heavy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatTest-heavy tag appears in online review

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

No clear exam policy

Online

The online review has a test-heavy tag but gives no clear exam .

Test-heavy tagNo clear exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would NEVER encourage this class for anyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

0/100

“I would NEVER encourage this class for anyone.”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“The workload is awful, expect to draw 3 sketches, practically an , and a presentation or debate for the week.”

👎 Teaching Experience

5/100

“Passive-aggressive. Does not care about students.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There were so anymore.
  • The workload is awful, expect to draw 3 sketches, practically an , and a presentation or debate for the week.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • !!
  • This professor is extremely hard to work with as she and has high standards for assignments.

Theme 3

👎 About Classroom Experience

  • Passive-aggressive. Does not care about students.
  • She's constantly changing the and expects us to be okay with it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews are highly consistent and detailed, but the sample is small and concentrated in one course.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENSC-105 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1