AI Rate Professor

History

Kelly Cricchio

ARTH5 · ARTH1 · ARTH7 · ARTH4 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

with few assignments and a very realistic A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AVery little homeworkNice and organizedLecture heavyFew graded items
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the class as easy, low-workload, and .
  • Grades usually come from a small number of constant assignments.
  • Lectures can be boring or slide-heavy, but students , and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Students repeatedly earned A grades and describe the class as easy with and few graded items.

, while the single online review is also positive but less grade-specific.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The content is lecture-based and memory-focused, with students calling the tests, quizzes, and assignments easy.

In-person reviews clearly show easy course content; the online , and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Showing up and taking notes helps, but posted lectures and low workload make the class fairly forgiving.

and posted lectures, while online evidence does not describe a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend her because the , and taught by a nice professor.

Both formats are positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Grades are mostly A or A+ and students describe tests, quizzes, papers, and projects as easy and clearly prepared for.

Format shift

; the online review is positive but less detailed about grading.

Workload

Featherlight

98/100

Students repeatedly mention , and only a few tests, papers, or projects.

Format shift

, while the online review mentions weekly discussions and passive lecture materials.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe her as , and clear, though several say lectures can be boring.

Format shift

Both formats are positive, with online emphasizing organization and in-person emphasizing kindness and passion.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Grades often center on a few tests or quizzes plus papers and .

Format shift

, and projects; the online review mentions weekly peer discussions but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews consistently , and a nice lecture-based professor.

Main concern

Lectures may feel boring even though the course is easy.

What students said

“Super ”
ARTH7
“All you have to do is show up and .”
ARTH1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review describes a very organized course , and readings.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one positive online review.

What students said

“ .”
ARTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are student-friendly because reviews describe only a few easy or prepared-for tests, papers, and .

Few testsEasy quizzesMemory-based testsEssay-heavy testsGroup project final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, essay-based exams, papers, and a group project final, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Three testsEasy quizzesEssay-based examsGroup project finalVisual analysis paper
“Two easy, memory-based tests with and a .”
ARTH1
“3 easy quizzes and a .”
ARTH4

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, midterm format, final format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

No clear exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super easy class, very little homework, excluding the exam)”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Easy A Signal

96/100

“Nothing against the professor but me personally this class was just so boring. However, it was a easy A”

📚 Workload Lightness

98/100

“ , and and letting us work on it in class!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ if I could.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super
  • This class was pretty easy.
  • 3 easy quizzes and a .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Cricchio is a great teacher.
  • .
  • You can tell she's passionate about her field and really enjoys art history.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • There and .
  • , and a , which was the final.
  • All you have to do is show up and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent reviews are detailed and highly consistent, though only one online review limits online-specific confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTH15 reviews
ARTH44 reviews
ARTH53 reviews
ARTH71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 5 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1