AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jeremy Trindade

MATH31S · MTH1 · MTH21 · MATH47 · MTH20 · MTH32253 · MATH2 · MATH20 · MATH15 · MATH53 · MTH2 · MTH47 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
97.06%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with regular practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear exam preparationCaring and accessibleHomework-heavy practiceGroup work focusedFair grading
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and .
  • The , and attendance, but exams usually match practice work.
  • Grades are fair to generous when students keep up, ask questions, and show their work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is very reachable because and exams mirror homework, but students , and practice.

Online evidence is more exam-heavy, while , and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content is not effortless, but , and review work make it manageable.

Online students mention self-learning pressure, while and group sessions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance is often important because class activities, group work, and .

In-person reviews strongly stress attendance, while online reviews do .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes exams predictable.

Both formats are positive, but and more consistent recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

He is not a and , and effort.

Format shift

and , while in-person reviews repeatedly emphasize fair partial credit and clear criteria.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is regular and , and exam preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews describe time-consuming self-paced work, while and participation work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe him as , and strong at making math understandable.

Format shift

Online reviews are positive but fewer, while and consistent praise for lectures and support.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and finals, though some courses are test heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews lean more exam-heavy, while , group work, projects, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews consistently , and important class participation.

Main concern

Attendance and group work matter, and .

What students said

“The so there are never any surprises”
MTH21
“not a and will give you as as he can as long as your work is shown clearly”
MTH1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise his teaching and grading but warn that exams and .

Main concern

The online workload and .

What students said

“Nice Professor but an overwhelming amount of material!”
MATH20
“ and homework.”
MTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually conventional but student-friendly because and review material.

Homework-Like ExamsTest Heavy in Some CoursesMultiple Midterms and FinalPartial Credit for Work Shown

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review work, but they do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Homework-Like ExamsThree Midterms and FinalTest Heavy in Some Courses
“The so there are never any surprises”
MTH21
“there are three midterms worth 15% each and a final worth 20%”
Math31S

Online

Online and easier homework-like exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exams Worth 80 PercentHomework-Like ExamsMultiple Choice Penalty Risk
“His exams made up 80% of your grade.”
MATH2
“ , but .”
MTH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The so there are never any surprises”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“His teaching style made it easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ !”

⚖️

78/100

“not a and will give you as as he can as long as your work is shown clearly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and detailed.
  • His lecture videos and .
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This class was a lot of , but it helped with studying.
  • week so students can practice and ask each other for help.
  • Hard class w/ lot of HW but focus & you're all good.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams and Grades

  • The so there are never any surprises
  • His study guides .
  • He isn't a but you must work hard to deserve a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 34 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent themes about teaching, workload, and grading.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MTH2110 reviews
MTH18 reviews
MATH203 reviews
Math31S2 reviews
MTH22 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MTH202 reviews
MTH472 reviews
MATH151 review
MATH21 review
MATH471 review
MATH531 review
MTH322531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 15

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1