AI Rate Professor

Engineering & Math

Jared Gochuico

ENGR43 · ENGR25 · ENGR10 · ENGR11 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and hands-on projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorEasy AGroup projectsClear gradingCareer focused
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as caring, funny, and .
  • Grades are usually easy when students complete projects and assignments.
  • The main tradeoff is that some classes rely on self-teaching and group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Most graded reviews report A or A+ grades, and students explicitly call the class an Easy A with and .

The Easy A evidence is strongest in person, while the single online review only confirms strong approval.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The material is described as easy and introductory, though .

In-person reviews describe the course as easy and engaging, while the online evidence is too brief to judge content depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

One review says students could join over Zoom instead of attending in person, and .

Attendance flexibility is supported by in-person evidence, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost universally recommend him because , and supportive of engineering students.

Both formats are positive, but nearly all detailed .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grades are mostly A or A+ and comments mention , and .

Format shift

, while the online review only reports a positive experience.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work appears manageable, with projects and weekly asynchronous tasks but little evidence of overwhelming workload.

Format shift

and weekly work; the online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe him as caring, respected, engaging, and helpful, despite some self-teaching comments.

Format shift

The , while the single online review is positive but sparse.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears centered on projects, skill checks, assignments, and prototypes more than traditional exams.

Format shift

, and few grading items, while online evidence is not specific.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

focus, and easy grading, with some notes about self-teaching.

Main concern

Some students say the course depends on self-teaching and group projects.

What students said

“easy chill class, lets you join over zoom if you don't want to go in person, gave us donuts. Easy A”
ENGR25
“Much of his class is self-teaching.”
ENGR11
“Course material is easy. Very engaging.”
ENGR10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only online review is extremely positive but too brief to prove much beyond strong satisfaction.

Main concern

The evidence is very thin because the review .

What students said

“Recommend, 10/10”
ENGR10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears to vary by course.

ProjectsSkill ChecksPossible Test Heavy Sections

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some test-heavy sections, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Group ProjectsSkill ChecksTest Heavy In Some Courses
“ and exams 80 % of your grade.”
ENGR11
“he mainly grades on skills you presented on either the skill checks or the midterm and final.”
ENGR10

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easy chill class, lets you join over zoom if you don't want to go in person, gave us donuts. Easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He helps me out with everything :)”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“professor Jared has a PED in as a Civil Engineer highly recommend taking any class he teaches for engineering.”

📈 Grade Value

95/100

“Easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jared was great, this was his first time teaching the course so it was a bit iffy at times.
  • Taking his class honestly helped me to explore engineering properly, and his assignments felt like actual introductions to different engineering disciplines instead of a generic curriculum.
  • Great professor. You're gonna have and learning, but the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy chill class, lets you join over zoom if you don't want to go in person, gave us donuts. Easy A
  • Course material is easy. Very engaging.
  • Some lectures felt either too late or too early for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • /professional insight - good for any job questions.
  • and teaches in different way from the typical teaching method.
  • Jared very good. He helps me out with everything :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 recent reviews with highly consistent positive sentiment, though several are playful or low-detail.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1011 reviews
ENGR114 reviews
212401 review
ENGR251 review
ENGR431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 9 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3