AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charlene Wieser

MATH65 · MATH1 · MTH20 · MATH2 · MATH20 · CALC2 · MATH55 · MTH65 · 20877MATH55 · MTH2 · MTH255 · MTH55 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
82.86%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a caring, structured math professor and are willing to keep up with and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesLots of homeworkTest heavyCaringFast paced
  • Most students praise her clarity, care, and structured math instruction.
  • The course , and exam preparation.
  • She is a strong fit for students who want to learn math, not for students seeking a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Students can earn high grades by doing the homework and studying, but the , and workload make the A costly.

Online and evidence giving much more detail about homework and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Her explanations are clear, but the , and often require memorization.

Online reviews emphasize fast pace and extra study, while and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Several reviews say attending class is important, and one says she takes daily attendance, though .

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and effective, but not if students want a light or forgiving math class.

dissent, while online evidence is mixed and limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

as fair and homework-aligned, but and some students call her tough.

Format shift

, while online reviews show grades depend heavily on tests and quizzes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and exam preparation.

Format shift

Both formats report meaningful workload, but the heavy-workload pattern is much stronger in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most , and helpful, despite fast pacing and a minority of very negative reviews.

Format shift

, while online reviews are mixed because one student struggled after the course moved online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades , and tests, with homework mainly preparing students for them.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with online reviews saying grades depend on tests and quizzes and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews consistently describe clear, caring lectures with lots of , and a fast pace.

Main concern

The workload and test weight can punish students who fall behind.

What students said

“ and can doom your grade if you fail more than once.”
MATH1
“There is a lot of , but all the quizzes and .”
MATH2
“No calculators allowed-old school but effective”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews say the class is fast-paced and and one withdrawal after struggling with lecture-homework alignment.

Main concern

Online students may need extra study because tests and .

What students said

“Tests are posted ahead of time (24/48 hr tests) & are open notes (just not online help/cheating).”
MATH1
“Don't rec if you don't plan to do extra study”
MATH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually traditional and test-heavy, with one online review reporting open-notes 24 or 48 hour tests and several in-person reviews reporting no calculators or heavy midterms.

Test HeavyOpen Notes Online ReviewNo Calculators In Some CoursesFrequent QuizzesHeavy Midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe frequent quizzes, heavily weighted exams, memorization, and no calculators in some courses, but .

Test HeavyNo Calculators In Some CoursesFrequent QuizzesMidterms
“No calculators allowed-old school but effective”
MATH55
“ and can doom your grade if you fail more than once.”
MATH1
“Definitely an lot for the exams.”
CALC2

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention posted 24 or 48 hour open-notes tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Open NotesPosted Ahead Of TimeTest Heavy
“Tests are posted ahead of time (24/48 hr tests) & are open notes (just not online help/cheating).”
MATH1
“Since hw isn't graded, your .”
MATH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was amazing and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Wieser is an excellent mathematician and and in a way that is simple for those who may struggle to comprehend.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“There is a lot of , but all the quizzes and .”

🧪

82/100

“ and can doom your grade if you fail more than once.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor, conveys ideas clearly and always asks if anyone has questions throughout the lecture.
  • Extremely thorough during lectures--which is great for someone w/a learning disability who needs the .
  • and funny.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the homework and study and you'll pass.
  • A and no study guides, so you will have to study and work hard for your grade.
  • If you cannot memorize things, you will absolutely not pass this class

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of homework, but prepares you for quizzes and exams.
  • .
  • and uses online hw

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many years with rich detail and a consistent pattern of .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 544
4 out of 516
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH5515 reviews
MATH18 reviews
MATH208 reviews
CALC26 reviews
MATH23 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MTH203 reviews
MTH22 reviews
20877MATH551 review
MATH651 review
MTH2551 review
MTH551 review
MTH651 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

5

C 5

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2