AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daniel Quigley

MTH37 · MATH37 · MTH22 · ENGR25 · ENGR10 · MATH15 · ENGR45 · ENGR43 · ENGR36 · MTH15 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84.85%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Quigley if you will keep up with the work and use , but be cautious in online sections if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyHelpful and approachableLenient gradingMath can be confusingWorkload varies
  • Quigley is widely praised as , and .
  • Grades can be very achievable because he offers many ways to .
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with some students struggling with , and communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A good grade is very attainable because , dropped grades, completion-based work, and .

Both formats show grade recovery, but while online reviews include more setup and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course content is not always easy, especially math and engineering labs, but and support make it manageable for many students.

Online students more often report confusion with lectures or modules, while in-person students more often separate .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Attendance and participation help, but , and lenient attendance in some sections.

Online reviews provide the clearest flexibility evidence, while and office-hour help.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend him for kindness, accessibility, , and fair grade recovery, despite some online lecture concerns.

, while online reviews are still favorable but more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

87/100

Students repeatedly cite , dropped grades, completion-based homework, and as major grade boosters.

Format shift

Both formats show generous grading, with online reviews explicitly noting that .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Workload varies by course, with many homework, labs, quizzes, discussions, and and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention confusing homework systems and discussion posts, while and several weekly assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students , and knowledgeable, though a minority say lectures are unclear or communication is slow.

Format shift

, while online feedback includes repeated lecture clarity concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment blends homework, labs, quizzes, , and rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online sections mention quizzes, exams, homework, discussions, and labs; and recorded lecture support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students highlighting , and lenient grading.

Main concern

Some in-person students mention lots of .

What students said

“The material for ENGR45 is NOT EASY.”
ENGR45
“Just complete work and will get A.”
MTH15
“Doing just average on the .”
ENGR45

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but mixed, praising and support while , and tough exams in some sections.

Main concern

Some online students report unclear lectures, awkward homework submission, slow communication, and difficult exams.

What students said

“ and though.”
MATH15
“his lectures were difficult to understand”
MATH37
“You and still walk away with an A in the class.”
ENGR45

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally manageable because of at-home formats, open-note quizzes, optional or dropped-grade policies, and , but some finals and .

Online At-Home ExamsOpen Note QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesOptional FinalDropped Test GradeTough Final

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exams, at-home online exams in one course, an , and a hard final in another section.

Online At-Home ExamsOptional FinalDropped Test GradeHard Final
“The midterms and .”
ENGR10
“Final is optional, but and final.”
MTH22
“The . .”
MATH15

Online

Online reviews mention open-note and open-book quizzes, quizzes , and , but do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Open Note QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesQuizzes Every Other WeekOne FinalTough Exams
“ and though.”
MATH15
“ and .”
MTH15
“The but there are other ways to succeed in the coursework.”
ENGR45

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You and still walk away with an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online course structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and very patient.”

⚖️ Grade Recovery

87/100

“LOTS of ex-credit. . You can still pass if you fail the midterm and final.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“100% believe you should take his class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Quigley is patient and friendly.
  • The professor is extremely friendly; his lectures are straightforward and he makes math less intimidating and easier.
  • Mr. Quigley is always willing to answer questions in-office hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades &

  • A LOT of opportunities.
  • Doing just average on the .
  • Lots of extra credits to make up for .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Challenges

  • Lectures are hard to understand and not very concise
  • the way he sets up the
  • Took his math course online and his lectures were difficult to understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews with many detailed comments and a consistent pattern of , and format-based differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 516
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH3712 reviews
ENGR4511 reviews
MATH158 reviews
MTH158 reviews
ENGR435 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGR252 reviews
ENGR101 review
ENGR361 review
MTH221 review
MTH371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 4

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 9