AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Rudolph Cockerham

N70 · NURSA130 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnorganizedUnclear GradingForgetfulLow Learning Value
  • Students describe unclear or .
  • In-person comments say he can be experienced or cool, but disorganization causes confusion.
  • The small review set is negative overall, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades may be attainable, but comments suggest they depend on subjective memory and .

Online evidence does not address grades, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material itself is not described as especially hard, but confusion about what to learn or study makes the course harder.

Only in-person reviews provide course difficulty evidence; the online review is not enough to judge course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because being known may affect grading, but no review proves a .

In-person evidence suggests attendance and being remembered matter, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because , and learning value are repeatedly criticized.

Both formats are negative, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

as subjective, memory-based, and not reliably tied to rubrics or proof of work.

Format shift

, while online evidence does not clearly address grading policy.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews do not describe a heavy workload, and the main complaints focus on organization and .

Format shift

No format provides strong workload detail, so this rating is low-confidence and based on absence of workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students describe poor organization, confusion, lack of learning, and unpreparedness despite some mention of experience.

Format shift

Online evidence criticizes preparedness, while and learning clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so the assessment mix cannot be strongly determined.

Format shift

Neither format provides enough evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe him as experienced but , and inconsistent with .

Main concern

Students may not know what to study or how grades are actually determined.

What students said

“he's forgetful and unorganized”
N70
“ but it didn't matter he doesn't go by it.”
NURSA130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review concerns a leadership or ceremony experience and describes him as careless and unprepared.

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited and not clearly about normal course instruction.

What students said

“It came across as careless and unprepared.”
NURSA130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Grades you on how he thinks you did in class, that's if he remembers you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I did not learn much from this guy.”

⚖️

15/100

“ but it didn't matter he doesn't go by it.”

📋 Organization

20/100

“he's forgetful and because most the time the class is confused on what we should learn or study for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super cool professor. Smart, honest, and experienced
  • I did not learn much from this guy.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Grades you on how he thinks you did in class, that's if he remembers you.
  • Get on his "good side" and he will pass you.

Theme 3

📋 About Organization

  • he's forgetful and unorganized
  • It came across as careless and unprepared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across a long time span make the signal weak, though the negative concerns are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NURSA1302 reviews
N701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values