AI Rate Professor

Communication

Stephanie Eisenberg Todd

COMM48 · COMM1 · COMM12 · COMM46 · COMM46002 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can follow rubrics and handle participation, but if you need high flexibility or warm communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaParticipation-heavyExtra credit availableMixed communicationDebate and speech focused
  • Students , and participate usually do well.
  • and structure, but several describe her as rude or unsympathetic.
  • Online COMM1 reviews are more negative about workload, responsiveness, and group speech logistics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very realistic if , and complete speeches or debates, with helping in several classes.

In-person reviews more often call it an easy A, while online reviews say the grade is fair but , and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is not intellectually hard, but , and group work add practical pressure.

Online COMM1 feels easier to some students but less structured, while and speaking courses require more preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Participation and , but reviews do not show a .

Both formats stress participation, with online requiring live or recorded speech audiences and in-person relying on debates and class work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and feedback, but communication tone and flexibility are serious concerns.

In-person students are more enthusiastic overall, while online reviews are more polarized and include several strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

73/100

, and many students earned A grades when they completed the work.

Format shift

as more predictably easy, while but sometimes slow or viewed as tough.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable but , and group coordination.

Format shift

Online COMM1 has heavier speech logistics, while and public speaking require steady preparation.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many , and support, but a notable minority report rude comments, poor sympathy, or self-teaching.

Format shift

, while online feedback shows more frustration with structure and communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades appear driven mostly by speeches, debates, outlines, readings, quizzes, participation, and .

Format shift

Online assessment centers on speeches, quizzes, and coursework, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and public speaking students who participate and do the readings.

Main concern

Students who do not prepare for .

What students said

“she honestly was an easy A.”
COMM46
“You're teaching yourself.”
COMM12
“Professor Eisenberg Todd will make you feel welcome and give you all the tools to succeed in class.”
COMM1

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and complaints about rude communication, slow replies, and live speech requirements.

Main concern

Responsiveness and sympathy and group issues.

What students said

“The outline provided but .”
COMM1
“expect to teach yourself for this class.”
COMM1
“she has a calendar which tells you everything you will be doing and when”
COMM46

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe speeches, debates, quizzes, and coursework, with and .

Pop QuizzesFinal MentionedSpeech PresentationsDebates

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

DebatesPop QuizzesMedium Final
“ if .”
COMM46
“The ; easy if you read”
COMM46002

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and live or recorded speeches, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Online SpeechesQuizzesLive Audience Requirement
“There's a total of 4 live speeches”
COMM1
“Overall if you do the speeches and all the .”
COMM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do your work and attend class and you'll be alright.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Great professor, I took both comm 46 and 11. and funny.”

⚖️

73/100

“ and was easy to follow.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Professor Eisenberg was truly amazing.
  • You're teaching yourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she honestly was an easy A.
  • Do the and follow the outlines you'll be fine.
  • The outline provided but .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • She will help you if you ask for help
  • She is !
  • Rarely to never accepts late work but offers opportunities.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 21 reviews span recent and older terms, include both formats, and show consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMM110 reviews
COMM468 reviews
COMM121 review
COMM460021 review
COMM481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

6

B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1