Nataliya Gavryshova

MATH20 · MATH15 · MTH47 · STAT43 · MTH43 · MATH55 · STATISTICS · MTH2 · MTH31 · MTH6 · MATH43 · MATHPREC · MATH4 · MAT105 · STAT · MTH201548 · CLASS · MTH37 · MTH1 · MATH105 · MTH55 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 43/100
RMP rating: 2.9/5
Take again: 33.33%
Difficulty: 2.9

The decision

Take Nataliya Gavryshova only if you are comfortable self-teaching math and using office .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecturesHeavy accentSelf-teaching neededHelpful one-on-oneInconsistent organization

Students often describe lectures as .
One-on-one help, soft deadlines, cheat sheets, and feel.
The textbook and homework instead of lecture alone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades , and soft deadlines, but many students still report heavy self-study and hard tests.

Online evidence is mixed and workload-heavy, while , and homework-based passing.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math content is not always advanced beyond normal expectations, but rushed pacing and .

Both formats mention difficulty, but drives the challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

is optional or light and others saying it is graded or important.

Format evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, with one COVID-era in-person-labeled review noting optional attendance that was still graded.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

communication issues, and use her help outside lecture.

Online reviews are too few and polarized, while in-person reviews consistently show a depends-on-your-learning-style pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

curves, soft deadlines, partial credit, and cheat sheets.

Format shift

Online reviews mention random or tough grading, while and test aids.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many students report lots of , and frequent test preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially workload-heavy, while in-person workload varies by course but often remains substantial.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Students often say she is caring one-on-one, but , and hard to understand.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as disorganized in two reviews, while , and fast pacing.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Assessment appears to mix homework, quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and tests, while in-person reviews , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a long pattern of rushed lectures and communication and useful one-on-one help.

Main concern

Students often need to learn from the textbook because lectures can be .

What students said

“Good class if you are good at learning from the textbook.”
MATH15

“ if you do hw.”
MTH6

“Basically you have to teach yourself.”
CLASS

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with two reporting disorganization and heavy work and .

Main concern

Online and .

What students said

“This was the most unorganized class I have ever taken.”
MATH15

“Gives A TON of homework and the .”
MTH31

“she wants you to pass.”
STAT43

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some tests are hard, but several reviews mention cheat sheets, curves, partial credit, or .

Cheat Sheet AllowedCurved TestsSome Take-Home TestsHard Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support cheat sheets, curves, easy-if-you-study tests, and proctoring.

Cheat Sheet AllowedCurved TestsSome Take-Home TestsHard Tests Mentioned

“ .”
MTH2

“ .”
MTH6

“ if you do hw.”
MTH6

Online

and test-heavy work, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Hard ExamsTest Heavy

“Gives A TON of homework and the .”
MTH31

“helps you understand what will be on the test”
STAT43

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Good class if you are good at learning from the textbook.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Her lectures are long and difficult to follow unless you are critically thinking the whole time.”

⚖️

58/100

“ if you do hw.”

📚 Self-Teaching Need

44/100

“Basically you have to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She makes mistakes on lectures which confuses students.
She teaches a bit fast, and sometimes its somewhat hard to understand her(she has an accent).
If you ask her for help one on and caring.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

.
HW has soft deadlines, but don't fall behind!
The and I do not believe the teacher understands how long it takes to do them.

Theme 3

🧭 About Fit

Good class if you are good at learning from the textbook.
I do not recommend this class unless you can absorb info like a sponge.
if you want to learn, and to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give strong credibility, though opinions vary widely by course and student learning style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510

4 out of 512

3 out of 510

2 out of 512

1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH558 reviews

CLASS6 reviews

MATH434 reviews

MTH313 reviews

MTH373 reviews

Show 16 more courses

MTH473 reviews

MTH63 reviews

MATH152 reviews

MATH202 reviews

MTH22 reviews

MTH432 reviews

STAT432 reviews

STATISTICS2 reviews

MAT1051 review

MATH1051 review

MATH41 review

MATHPREC1 review

MTH11 review

MTH2015481 review

MTH551 review

STAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 7 · A 5 · A- 4

B range

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

C 2

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1

Nataliya Gavryshova

Take Nataliya Gavryshova only if you are comfortable self-teaching math and using office x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Varies

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

📚 Self-Teaching Need

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Grades And Work

🧭 About Fit

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Take Nataliya Gavryshova only if you are comfortable self-teaching math and using office .

⚖️