AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ming Ho

MATH65 · CSCI14 · STATS1 · MTH30693 · MTH43 · MTH43008 · MATH54L · STATISTICS · MATHMATH · MATH43 · MATH62 · MATH31 · 54L · MATH104 · MATH · MATH105 · MATH2 · ELEMALGEBRA · STATS43 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself most of the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest-heavy gradingConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredTough grader
  • Most students describe the class as , and hard to learn from.
  • Grades are often dominated by tests, with .
  • A few students find him caring or helpful one-on-one, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very hard because , and students often say they must self-teach.

The strongest evidence comes from in-person reviews, while but give too little grade detail.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The math content is made much , and expectations that students already know the material.

Online evidence is mixed and limited, but as confusing and difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students say missing class or not keeping up makes the course much harder.

, while online reviews do not clearly establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because they find the , and the workload stressful.

Both formats include negative comments, but the and more severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call him a and homework.

Format shift

, while online reviews give less direct grading evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many students report lots of , and a workload that feels hard to manage.

Format shift

Both online and , but in-person reviews describe it more intensely.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments say , and expects students to learn on their own.

Format shift

, while online reviews mainly criticize communication and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Reviews repeatedly say the grade is .

Format shift

The and lightly supported online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and a need to self-study.

Main concern

Students say the class is harder than needed because and .

What students said

“100% of and the ”
MATH
“You MUST do a lot of studying on your own”
MATH43

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are limited but and weak support, with one review calling the class itself easy.

Main concern

Students may get quick replies but .

What students said

“So .”
STATS1
“there's a lot of homework.”
MATH31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The overall exam risk is high because and are difficult.

Test-heavy gradingWeekly testsFew graded items

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly describe a test-dominated grade structure but .

100% test scoresWeekly testsFew graded items
“100% of ”
MATH
“You will have a .”
MATH

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy tags but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Test-heavy grading
“Test heavy”
STATS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Barely actually teaches the course, it's like I taught myself everything at home through the Khan Academy and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ and go overtime often, which can be frustrating for a student.”

⚖️

15/100

“100% of and the ”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“You cant keep up with assignments (he gives 10+ a week)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not know HOW to teach.
  • His lectures are very unorganized and .
  • He expected us to know everything from the beginning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect to .
  • You will have a .
  • Out of two of his classes only 4 people got an A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Find another professor.
  • RUN from this guy!
  • There are infinitely better professors at Chabot that can teach you math

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 47 reviews span many years and repeatedly describe the same problems with , and workload.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH9 reviews
MATH438 reviews
MTH434 reviews
MATH23 reviews
54L2 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH1042 reviews
MATH312 reviews
MATH54L2 reviews
MATH622 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
STATS12 reviews
CSCI141 review
ELEMALGEBRA1 review
MATH1051 review
MATH651 review
MTH306931 review
MTH430081 review
STATS431 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 4