AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dangthu Ta

MATH43 · MTH43STATS · MATH65 · MTH22 · MATH103 · MTH43 · MATH6 · MATH120 · MATH53 · MATH55 · MTH3 · MATH47 · MATH31 · MTH31 · STATS · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
73.08%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle fast math lectures, online homework, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring but polarizingFast-paced lecturesLots of online homeworkExtra credit opportunitiesSelf-study needed
  • Students often praise Ta as kind, funny, flexible, and invested in student success.
  • Many negative reviews , and needing to teach yourself.
  • Grades , and effort, but the learning experience varies widely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Grades are attainable because she offers , retries, flexible deadlines, and online practice, but students must keep up with heavy work.

Online evidence sounds easier and more forgiving, while because fast pacing can make the same work feel harder.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Math content is not inherently easy, and her fast lecture style can make .

Online reviews describe straightforward structure, while and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is often important for participation and keeping up, but .

In-person reviews mention participation and being called on more often, while online reviews focus on deadlines and class-time clarification.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

She is recommended by students who value flexibility and support, but avoided by students .

Online reviews are strongly favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, retries, deadline extensions, and repeatable online work make grades more forgiving than the teaching difficulty suggests.

Format shift

Online reviews especially praise second chances, while and reopened assignments.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and short deadlines.

Format shift

Both formats include online homework, but and pace.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is caring and knowledgeable, but reviews are split because many students find her lectures rushed, disorganized, or .

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are positive, while poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

Assessment uses , and rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Both formats rely heavily on online systems, with in-person reviews mentioning board work and exams more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for caring support but , and teaching style.

Main concern

Fast lectures and .

What students said

“You basically need to teach yourself.”
MATH43
“she gives a lot of chances to get your grade up.”
MATH6

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive and describe straightforward work, , second chances, and helpful support.

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with and quizzes.

What students said

“the class could not have been easier.”
MATH6
“she gives you a lot of ”
MATH53

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policies are often student-friendly where described, with open notes, second tries, , or allowed reference cards in several reviews.

Open-Note QuizzesExtra Credit On TestsSecond Try TestsCheat Sheet AllowedCalculator Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, calculator use, and cheat sheets in some courses, but some finals are described as hard.

Open-Note QuizzesExtra Credit On TestsCheat Sheet AllowedCalculator AllowedHard Final In Some Reviews
“Quizzes are open-note and she .”
MTH3
“Mrs. Ta allows you to use a cheat sheet and a calculator for exams.”
MATH55

Online

Online reviews support simple quizzes and second-try tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Simple QuizzesSecond Try TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“we'd have a simple 1-3 question quiz on a .”
MATH6
“she will give you second try which is same question as the first test.”
MATH53

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If and and can study on your own, you'll do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting split themes in support, workload, teaching pace, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Weird teaching style she would pick random examples of the chapter we were working on and do them.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“As long as you stay on top of your work and put actual effort into learning, you will be just fine.”

⚖️

78/100

“She gives you practice tests that are basically the exact copies of the test. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are strange since she only goes over HW problems, but you eventually get used to her teaching style.
  • She goes too fast during lectures.
  • , although she can be a little difficult to keep up with.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is an insane amount of deadlines.
  • you can keep doing it until you get 100%, quizzes too.
  • Put in the work, get the grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She's a and truly cares for her students.
  • She really wants you to pass.
  • She helps everyone and his class had an overall good environment.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide rich evidence, though opinions are polarized by course, year, and learning style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 59
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH4320 reviews
MATH1034 reviews
MATH534 reviews
MATH653 reviews
MTH223 reviews
Show 10 more courses
STATS3 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH312 reviews
MATH552 reviews
MATH62 reviews
MATH471 review
MTH31 review
MTH311 review
MTH431 review
MTH43STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 11

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 2 · Rather not say 1