AI Rate Professor

English

Ronald Lorette

ENGL1A · ENG7 · ENGL1 · ENGL4 · ENG4 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
68%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want structured writing growth and can keep up with frequent essays and strict deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed writing feedbackHeavy essay workloadClear expectationsStrict attendanceSupportive but demanding
  • , and writing support.
  • The main drawback is a heavy stream of essays, reading, and weekly assignments.
  • and punctuality can be strict, while online reviews sound more flexible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A is realistic for organized students, but , and weekly assignments.

Online evidence is easier-A leaning, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content is normal English writing work, but the , and critical writing expectations raise the challenge.

Online reviews call the , while as repetitive or demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

In-person students repeatedly report strict attendance and punctuality expectations, while online reviews focus .

The ; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

and feedback, but workload and attendance complaints create real hesitation.

Online reviews are strongly positive overall, while and workload frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students report , and some tough grading rather than broadly easy grading.

Format shift

Online reviews mention clearer and more forgiving grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students describe lots of , and back-to-back writing assignments.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is often described as , and helpful with writing, despite some complaints about repetitive lectures and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize care and feedback, while and more classroom-management complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus , and writing activities, with little exam emphasis.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

for feedback and lectures but repeated complaints about workload and attendance.

Main concern

Heavy essays and .

What students said

“Strict about attendance, will talk to you after class if ”
ENGL1
“ and improvement on essays.”
ENGL1
“He is not a bad teacher, but he has a crazy workload expectation.”
ENG4

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and many small assignments that .

Main concern

Expect steady weekly work and firm deadlines.

What students said

“He provides the modules early so you can get a head start.”
ENGL1
“Expect 3-4 assignments a week he makes it very clear that there will be no extensions easy class just do the ”
ENGL1
“There is a lot of work but it all builds up and helps you prepare for the .”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe essays and writing assignments, and only one in-person review mentions an in-class final without enough detail to define a .

Assignments And Essays DominateOne In-Class Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

explicitly mentioning an in-class final.

In-Class Final MentionedEssay-Heavy Assessment
“In .”
ENG4
“I got As , and got a 87 on the final.”
ENG7

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, final, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you aren't ready to do a lot of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and improvement on essays.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“There are 6 essays for the semester, one after the next.”

👍 Recommendation Value

73/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and improvement on essays.
  • He is very prepared, and knows how to make the class engaging and fun.
  • He provides the modules early so you can get a head start.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Still lots of reading and writing.
  • He gives a lotttt of work
  • .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Rules And Grading

  • No late work policy, and I think that's a good way to make sure students don't fall behind in class.
  • He is a tough and , however, you will go a long way if you stay committed.
  • if you're late

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 25 reviews across many years with , and attendance.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL112 reviews
ENGL1A4 reviews
ENGL44 reviews
ENG43 reviews
ENG72 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1