AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Najla Abrao

MATH43 · MTH21 · MATH65 · MTH20 · MTH43 · MTH53 · MATH53 · MATH55 · MTH43W · MATH31 · MTH65 · MTH55 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
82.61%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Najla Abrao if you want a and can handle a heavy, fast-paced workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots Of HomeworkClear ExplanationsExtra CreditExam Support
  • Most students praise her as , and unusually strong at explaining math.
  • The workload is consistently heavy, with , and practice tasks.
  • Grades can be very achievable because she gives resources, , , and cheat sheets, but students must keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earn strong , and study resources, but the A requires steady work.

, while online reviews are more mixed and sometimes much heavier.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The math content is often understandable because she explains well, but the , and .

Online sections can feel heavier because of long videos and many weekly tasks, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are often important, and one recent .

In-person reviews contain strong attendance warnings, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because she cares deeply and provides many supports, but workload and .

In-person recommendations are stronger and more consistent than online recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

She is not effortless, but , dropped homework, curves, cheat sheets, late-work options, and retake chances make grading forgiving for prepared students.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest proof of leniency, while online and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention daily or , and heavy time demands.

Format shift

Online workload has the strongest heavy-workload warning, while .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students say , and offers help, though a minority describe her as unsupportive or condescending.

Format shift

, while online reviews are more divided.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to combine homework, , and participation.

Format shift

Both formats include assignments and support and curves.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe a caring, energetic math teacher who gives many resources, but the course demands daily work and .

Main concern

Students who fall behind may struggle because , and .

What students said

“tons of , very forgiving hw policy”
MATH31
“ . hw every single day.”
MTH21
“She makes you work HARD for your grades”
MATH43

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and support, while others describe a , and weak statistics instruction.

Main concern

The online and some students question grading or course alignment.

What students said

“It takes me about 20 to 25 hours to finish all the .”
MATH43
“ and thorough”
MATH43
“ .”
MTH43

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests student-friendly supports such as , and , though exams still matter heavily.

Sample ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedCurved TestsMidterm Retake ChancePractice Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and one midterm retake chance, making exams more student-friendly despite high grade weight.

Sample ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedCurved ExamsMidterm Retake ChanceFinal Grade Exam Weight
“She gives sample midterms, sample finals, allows a cheat sheet, and ”
MATH43
“ and .”
MTH43
“ with your exams, though.”
MATH43

Online

Online reviews mention practice exams and fair assessment, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Practice ExamsFair Assessment MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ so helpful.”
MATH43
“The assessment method is fair and clear.”
MATH43

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work HARD for your grades, but the sense of , and shes a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She knows how to explain math concepts in ways that even weaker math students can understand.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“There are 14-16 , and homework every week in her course.”

⚖️

76/100

“She gives sample midterms, sample finals, allows a cheat sheet, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the material easy to understand
  • . singlehandedly made me like math.
  • Her lectures could not be clearer and easier to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • LOTS of hw everyday and group work in class for practice
  • She gives so much , and 10 hw assignments u can remove from ur grade
  • This class takes a lot of time but the effort put in .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Concerns

  • She genuinely wants us to succeed and will help us do so.
  • whenever I would ask for help she would make me feel like I'm just bothering her.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 46 detailed reviews across many math courses with and heavy workload.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH4313 reviews
MTH439 reviews
MATH318 reviews
MTH213 reviews
MTH553 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH532 reviews
MATH552 reviews
MTH202 reviews
MATH651 review
MTH43W1 review
MTH531 review
MTH651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 3

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 6

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2