AI Rate Professor

English

Kristin Land

ENG1A · ENG4A · ENG7 · ENGLISH1A · ENG102 · ENG12A · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90.48%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you want a but helps you earn the grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackWriting heavyGenerous gradingGrowth focused
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her as , and .
  • Grades are often generous, especially with , and strong support.
  • The , and personal writing expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

She is generous and supportive, but students still need to write, revise, participate, and keep up with reading.

, while online reviews are mostly positive but too few and mixed for full certainty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The class is beginner-friendly because of guidance and feedback, but the writing and .

support and workload, while online reviews provide limited course-content detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance and participation appear important, but reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews mention participation and , while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helps students grow as writers.

, while online reviews are positive overall but include one negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Students report light grading, rewrites, , and .

Format shift

, though the online sample is small and includes one negative review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is fair but , and projects appearing often.

Format shift

and essays, while online reviews mention writing but provide less detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive and highly positive, while online evidence is smaller but mostly supports the same pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews emphasize essays, writing assignments, discussion posts, projects, and group work instead of exams.

Format shift

Both and writing practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic about her care, feedback, community building, and .

Main concern

Students should expect reading, essays, group work, and participation rather than a no-effort A.

What students said

“it is basically impossible to fail her class.”
ENG1A
“There are 4 essays that will push you to your limits”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive but include one strong warning from an older ENG102 review.

Main concern

The small online sample is split between excellent support and one vague negative experience.

What students said

“She is an and not tough.”
ENG12A
“ ”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly writing-based, and reviews do .

No TestsEssay BasedOpen Pop QuizzesDebate MidtermAttendance Final Waiver

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention no tests in one class, open pop quizzes in another, and an , but policies vary by course.

No TestsOpen Pop QuizzesAttendance Final Waiver
“ ”
ENGLISH1A
“ and lectures”
ENG4A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she gives you a lot of and always has one on ones to help you get better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and writing workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She is one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ !”

✍️ Writing Support

88/100

“ and clear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and positive.
  • She really cares about her students and you can tell teaching is her passion
  • She helps you out any way she can.

Theme 2

✍️

  • she gives you a lot of and always has one on ones to help you get better.
  • and clear.
  • She pushes you on becoming a strong solid writer.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • She also graded very lightly (got over 100% on 3 essays)
  • There are 4 essays that will push you to your limits
  • You have to read, you have to put in the work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over many years are detailed and highly consistent, with only a few negative outliers.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A17 reviews
ENG4A6 reviews
ENGLISH1A4 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENG12A2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG72 reviews
1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 13 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1