AI Rate Professor

Art

Amy Raymond

ARHT1 · ARTH1 · ARTH5 · ARTHIS5 · ARTH4 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
95%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want an inspiring and and can handle steady work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and flexiblePassionate lecturesHomework heavyAttendance mattersClear exam guides
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her caring attitude, passion, and engaging art history lectures.
  • Grades are usually strong, but students must keep up with , and projects.
  • In-person reviews stress attendance, while and lecture watching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

A grades are common and , but students still need to complete frequent assignments, projects, notes, and .

Online evidence points to easy but steady homework, while attend and follow guidance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The because her lectures are engaging and guided, though art , and observation-based thinking.

Online reviews mention lecture-heavy pacing, while easier to absorb.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

because missed in-class assignments and lecture guidance can hurt grades.

In-person reviews repeatedly stress attendance, while online reviews do not provide a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend her because , and makes art history enjoyable despite the workload.

Both formats are strongly positive, with online students emphasizing support and in-person students emphasizing engaging lectures.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report , and many A grades, though exams and projects still require effort.

Format shift

Online reviews mention rubrics and , while and not being a hard grader.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is steady and sometimes heavy, with , and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews are more explicit about daily or frequent assignments, while consuming.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, passionate, engaging, and unusually good at making art history interesting.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with stronger lecture praise in the in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix homework, projects, papers, in-class work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, projects, written exams, and quizzes, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students strongly praise her lectures, passion, and care, while noting that attendance and note-taking matter.

Main concern

Skipping class hurts because in-class work, notes, and .

What students said

“She makes her class fun and exciting to attend, and what she teaches is never boring.”
ARTH4
“You MUST attend class, she lays out , and practically tells you what she expects you to say about the art.”
ARTH4
“Not a and she genuinely wants her students to succeed.”
ARTH1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe a , but the and studying.

Main concern

The and lecture-heavy pacing.

What students said

“The class is a , but it's really great for anyone who is interested in art from the past.”
ARTH4
“A lot of assignments, but generally super easy to do (sometimes tedious/busy work).”
ARTH5
“Expect to do work daily for this class.”
ARTH4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and written or identification tasks, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, or strict proctoring policies.

Study GuidesWritten ExamsThree ExamsProject Work

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Study GuidesThree ExamsImage Identification
“ and she gives you a study guide for exams”
ARTH4
“3 exams, study guides at the beginning of each unit and .”
ARTH4
“3 tests with matching vocab, matching art images, and identifying artifacts from study guide.”
ARTH4

Online

Online reviews mention tough or written exams and projects, but do not clearly .

Written ExamsTwo ExamsFinal Project
“ and you def need to study.”
ARTH4
“ but written so she can understand how we comprehend the artworks we learn about.”
ARTH4
“2 big projects, 2 exams.”
ARTH5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Raymond is wonderful, she is hands-down the nicest and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She makes her class fun and exciting to attend, and what she teaches is never boring.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“Not a and she genuinely wants her students to succeed.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Expect to do work daily for this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Raymond makes class interesting and helps you appreciate art like no other teacher could.
  • Her lectures are open, guided, and she pulls you into the world of Art.
  • You can tell she loves her field and that she wants you to enjoy it, too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of assignments, but generally super easy to do (sometimes tedious/busy work).
  • but effort is needed.
  • There is but they are not hard.

Theme 3

🕒

  • ! If you don't show up you'll get 0 for in
  • !
  • This course is very time consuming because of all the work she gives.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and strongly supported by grades and repeated themes.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTH413 reviews
ARTH54 reviews
ARHT11 review
ARTH11 review
ARTHIS51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1