AI Rate Professor

Computer Application Systems

John Gonder

CAS92A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly independent and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CourseToo Many PlatformsCondescending TonePoor SupportHigh Drop Risk
  • Most students describe the course as , and .
  • Online students repeatedly criticize the use of multiple platforms and limited instructor support.
  • One in-person student succeeded, but the broader pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

The A is possible for a self-directed student, but and poor support.

Online reviews make the A look hard due to course chaos, while workflow.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The subject may not be the main issue, but the scattered structure and .

, while in-person comments are mixed but still note quirky setup.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and Piazza use appear important.

Online reviews mention required support platforms, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly discourage taking him because the , and condescending.

Online reviews are consistently negative, while and one severe negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Reviews mention , and multiple withdrawals.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest harsh-grading evidence, while and mixed.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload feels heavy because students , and strict submission expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews show the heaviest burden from platform fragmentation, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students repeatedly call the , and unsupported.

Format shift

Online teaching is reviewed very poorly, while but includes one extreme negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize platform work, files, assignments, support forums, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and a final exam problem, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

experience and one severe complaint about disorder and condescension.

Main concern

Students who need structure or guidance may struggle.

What students said

“If you expect to be spoon fed this is not the class for you.”
CAS92A
“One of the most disorderly courses I've taken with an extremely condescending Professor.”
CAS92A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing multiple platforms, confusing videos, poor communication, and little direct support.

Main concern

Course organization and instructor support are the main problems.

What students said

“He spreads out his courses over 5 different platforms simply because .”
CAS92A
“His "teaching" is just a YouTube playlist you follow.”
CAS92A
“The course was , and .”
CAS92A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review reporting a final exam access failure but no clear proctoring rules.

Final Exam Activation IssueNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceStrict File Naming

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Online

Online reviews mention a final exam activation problem, but do not clearly .

Final Exam Activation IssueNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ ”
CAS92A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, teaching support, and student risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ , and scattered across too many platforms.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

12/100

“1/10, will never take again.”

📚 Course Organization

25/100

“The course was , and .”

Theme 1

🧭 About Course Structure

  • He spreads out his courses over 5 different platforms simply because .
  • Has his class on , and Cisco.
  • Not utilizing Cavanss Modules/barely utilizing Canvass which is provided by the college to keep everything orderly for course work.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When questions are asked on his question platform, he is condescending.
  • He's very incommunicative and his lectures are long and incoherent with random off-topic interjections.
  • His "teaching" is just a YouTube playlist you follow.

Theme 3

📉 About Student Outcome

  • If you expect to be spoon fed this is not the class for you.
  • It should not be made harder for students to learn.
  • I made an account just to rate this teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are enough to show a strong negative pattern, but the sample is small and centered on one course.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CAS92A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1