AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

JASMEET DHALIWAL

GEOS11 · ENSC10 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

She is a good fit for students who like creative environmental work and can handle some online organization issues.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring instructorCreative projectsConfusing online setupSlow gradingGroup final
  • In-person reviews are strongly positive, describing her as , and .
  • Online reviews are split, with praise for creativity and help but , and group projects.
  • Grades look attainable, but the online workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

77/100

Most reported grades are A-range and appears, but online grading delays and .

grades, while online reviews show A grades with more frustration and uncertainty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The work is usually manageable and creative, but online organization, writing, drawings, and .

and accessible, while and assignment-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do not clearly prove a , but online deadlines and no-late-work comments reduce flexibility.

Online reviews mention firm deadlines and no late work, while and support.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

59/100

, but online students are sharply divided over organization, grading speed, and group projects.

In-person reviews are highly positive, while online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades are often high and exists, but , and no late work.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe accommodation, while online reviews and deadlines.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class includes writing, drawings, field studies, labs, and heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews report more workload complaints, while as interesting and hands-on.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often described as caring and accessible, but online course organization and communication problems lower the experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching experience is strong, while online teaching experience is inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is driven mainly by assignments, writing, discussions, drawings, labs, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize writing, drawings, discussions, and a partner podcast; and worksheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive and , and accommodation.

Main concern

There is and group work expectations.

What students said

“She was really great, friendly, and understanding!”
32767
“ as you get hands on work with minerals and the petrographic microscopes.”
GEOS11

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with caring support and creative assignments balanced , and an awkward group final.

Main concern

Online and slow grading.

What students said

“Modules were tricky to navigate and .”
ENSC10
“The .”
32767

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews point to an assignment-based but creates group-work risk.

No Quizzes MentionedGroup Podcast FinalAssignment-Based Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no quizzes and a , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

No QuizzesPartner Podcast FinalAsynchronous Class
“No quizzes but a lot of writing, and drawings where you are required to be "creative".”
ENSC10
“The .”
32767

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was really great, friendly, and understanding!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, online structure, and assignment style. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Support

58/100

“Professor Dhaliwal is very caring and understanding about her students as long as they express interest.”

🧭 Online Organization

45/100

“Modules were tricky to navigate and .”

📌 Assessment Style

25/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Support

  • For any struggles, go to office hours and she'll help.
  • Very kind and accommodating, understood that students' faces struggled outside of school, and helped if you asked.
  • .

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • Lectures are not recognized, are not in the order.
  • Took forever to grade assignments making , and .
  • She does not have an actual syllabus.

Theme 3

🎨 About Assignments

  • If you are creative, you'd love this class, as you usually do drawings and field studies.
  • Assigned a and a classmate discussing a topic as a final.
  • as you get hands on work with minerals and the petrographic microscopes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews give useful evidence, but the online and and the .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

327674 reviews
ENSC104 reviews
GEOS111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2