AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nisha Guha

Courses not reported · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Take Nisha Guha only if you can self-teach chemistry, handle disorganization, and stay on top of .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy workloadTest heavyCaring but inconsistentSelf-teaching required
  • Students often describe the course as confusing and and .
  • Grades can be recoverable , and retakes, but .
  • Most negative reviews warn that students must self-teach and manage a heavy workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A , and steady effort, but and confusing teaching make it costly.

Both formats point to test-heavy grading, while and easy lab credit.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The chemistry content is manageable for some students, but , poor organization, and fast pacing make it feel challenging.

Online and in-person reviews both describe confusion, with in-person reviews giving stronger detail about scattered lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but reviews do not clearly prove a strict mandatory policy.

Evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students advise avoiding her because the , and dependent on self-teaching.

, though online evidence is limited to two reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

because tests carry high weight, though retakes, , and easy labs offer some recovery.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy tests, while and lab credit.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Both formats report workload pressure, with .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students find her caring and supportive, but , and .

Format shift

Online reviews say she is caring but confusing, while and lecture clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades , and some playing secondary roles.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests, and online reviews especially say tests can make or break the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly warn about , and .

Main concern

Students report scattered teaching and frequent self-teaching despite some chances to recover grades.

What students said

“Her lectures are scattered, the study guides are incomplete, and she treats everyone like they're in kindergarten.”
20031
“I will say the labs are easy for credit as long as work is shown and you are given a .”
20031

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews say she is caring but grades.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while .

What students said

“Her way of teaching us is often times confusing and it gets to the .”
20031
“Her test is heavy, you have 5 tests and .”
20031

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show heavy testing with , but exam rules are not fully consistent.

Heavy TestsRetake OpportunitiesFlash Card UsePop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention , and flash card use, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Retake OpportunitiesFlash Card UsePop QuizzesHeavy Tests
“she also give you chance to use flash card and .”
20031
“she will let you so you don't even have time to study.”
20031

Online

Online and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Heavy TestsPossible Retakes
“The so if you do bad it will be difficult to get back up to a good grade.”
20031
“ if she has time.”
20031

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If there are !”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her teaching ways were very confusing and because I taught myself through the textbook and youtube videos.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“this class was definitely a lot of work, and I was up for the challenge.”

🧪

48/100

“Her test is heavy, you have 5 tests and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are scattered, the study guides are incomplete, and she treats everyone like they're in kindergarten.
  • Lectures are so quick and .
  • The professor is very caring and willing to help students who need it .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The so if you do bad it will be difficult to get back up to a good grade.
  • I will say the labs are easy for credit as long as work is shown and you are given a .
  • Provides some .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Overall Advice

  • .
  • Save your GPA and .
  • If there are !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews across online and in-person formats show a consistent pattern of , and mixed support.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

2003110 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4