AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carol Conway

CS15 · CSCI14 · MATH37 · MTH20 · MATH20 · MATH15 · MATH6 · MATH55 · MATH31 · MTH8 · MTH6 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are already comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-study requiredHeavy homeworkConfusing lecturesHard testsFrequent grading errors
  • Most recent reviews describe lectures as mistakes.
  • Students repeatedly say the workload and them for.
  • and kindness, but recent evidence is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades because of curves or book-based work, but , and self-study as the real cost.

The easy-A evidence , while the single online review gives no grade-friendly signal.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The underlying material is sometimes called easy, but , and difficult tests make the course feel challenging.

delivery, while the lone online review also says lectures did not help.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Several reviews say she gets angry when students miss class or that skipping hurts passing, even when lectures are not seen as useful.

; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

because they feel they must teach themselves and are not prepared for tests.

Both formats are negative, but the recommendation signal is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Curves and occasional regrades exist, but many students report , and tests that feel unfair.

Format shift

and ; online evidence does not clearly describe grading policy.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Heavy workload , while the lone online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and not useful for learning.

Format shift

, and the one online review also says lectures did not help.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and occasional projects, with many comments emphasizing exams and quizzes.

Format shift

, and exams often; online evidence does not clearly describe assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently report unclear , and a need to self-study.

Main concern

Students say the class often feels like self-teaching with difficult or error-prone assessments.

What students said

“RUN! SHE IS THE teach yourself”
mth8
“Students will have to teach themselves.”
MATH31
“ .”
CSCI14

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says lectures did not help and moved ahead of the required material.

Main concern

Online evidence is too thin, but the one review is very negative about help and pacing.

What students said

“Does not help during lectures, goes over chapters AHEAD that is required.”
CSCI14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and and grading errors, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesCurved ExamsError-Prone Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and question errors, but not a clearly proven book or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesCurved ExamsError-Prone Questions
“ .”
mth8
“ because everyone .”
MATH37
“ , and you have less time to finish.”
MTH6

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students will have to teach themselves.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ .”

⚠️ Workload And Tests

22/100

“ and you have to study by yourself. So stressful with a lot of and papers. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

14/100

“ if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Students will have to teach themselves.
  • Her lecture is pretty much the examples shown in the box which we can look at ourself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • because everyone .
  • If you read the book and do the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • RUN! SHE IS THE teach yourself
  • !
  • if unavoidable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years give rich, highly consistent evidence, with the strongest recent trend being negative.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 526

Course coverage

MATH158 reviews
mth87 reviews
CSCI145 reviews
MATH314 reviews
MATH554 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH63 reviews
MTH203 reviews
MATH372 reviews
MTH62 reviews
CS151 review
MATH201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

7

B 7

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2