AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dorris Hanhan

MTH37 · MATH55MATH65 · MTH21 · MATH65 · MATH37 · MTH20 · MTH55005 · MATH20 · MTH55B · MATH55 · MATH31 · MTH65 · MTH55 · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a clear and and are willing to keep up with the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesHelpful in office hoursCaring teacherRequires steady effortFair but firm
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and deeply supportive.
  • The class is not a free A because , and exams matter.
  • She is especially strong for students who ask questions, attend class, and use office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are very possible, but students repeatedly , and prepare for quizzes and exams.

Both formats support effort-for-reward, with is not an effortless A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

She makes math clearer with examples and support, but the subject can still be fast-paced or difficult without preparation.

, while the single online review says the workload can be heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but many reviews say showing up and keeping pace are important for success.

Attendance expectations are mainly described in in-person reviews; the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students recommend her because , and gives meaningful help outside class.

Both formats are positive, with the high-confidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students describe fair grading, clear expectations, occasional dropped work, and .

Format shift

; online evidence says effort leads to passing but gives little grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and studying are steady and sometimes heavy, but students usually frame the workload as necessary and manageable.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, with the online review warning it can be much alongside another STEM class.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Reviews consistently praise her clear explanations, examples, office hours, patience, and care for struggling students.

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive and strongly positive, while the one online review is also positive but less detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments often mention quizzes, exams, tests, cumulative finals, and study guides, with .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise clear explanations, office-hour help, structure, and care, while noting that students must study.

Main concern

Students who skip homework or lack prerequisites may struggle despite the strong teaching.

What students said

“One of the so far.”
MTH21
“Definitely not an easy A because you have to do all the homework and study for the tests and quizzes.”
MTH55
“She really loves math and that comes through as she lectures.”
MATH37

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The one online review praises her as nice and understanding but says the workload can feel heavy with other STEM classes.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and warns that the class needs real time and focus.

What students said

“If you do the work and apply yourself you will pass.”
MATH55
“ as your only class.”
MATH55

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are central and can be tough, but , and similar quiz-test material rather than strict proctoring.

Quizzes And ExamsStudy GuidesCumulative FinalNo Calculator In Some Classes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe quizzes, exams, study guides, a , and sometimes no calculator, with .

Quizzes And ExamsStudy GuidesCumulative FinalNo Calculator In Some Classes
“Only Quizzes and .”
MATH55
“do .”
MATH55
“Doesn't allow you to use a calculator.”
MTH55

Online

The online review says the class is test heavy but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or .

Test Heavy
“ as your only class.”
MATH55

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the so far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ and structured.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ !!!!”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

62/100

“Definitely not an easy A because you have to do all the homework and study for the tests and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and structured.
  • She gave a lot of examples in class, and when you did not get it she will go over it again.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you study you can get an A.
  • Definitely not an easy A because you have to do all the homework and study for the tests and quizzes.
  • She is strict but has every right to be!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is always willing to help if you ask her.
  • Her office so .
  • She will help and work with you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

68

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide rich detail, and the positive teaching pattern is highly consistent despite a few negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 553
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH5517 reviews
MATH6510 reviews
MATH204 reviews
MATH374 reviews
MTH203 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MTH553 reviews
MTH372 reviews
MTH652 reviews
MATH311 review
MATH55MATH651 review
MTH211 review
MTH550051 review
MTH55B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1