AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Flyn

EN4 · ENGL4 · ENG4 · EN1A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take him if you want to improve your writing and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEssay heavyTough graderLots of readingHelpful revisionsMixed tone
  • Many recent in-person , and revision opportunities.
  • Negative reviews , and stressful essay expectations.
  • The course can be worthwhile for motivated writers but risky for students seeking an easy English requirement.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

A strong grade is possible through revisions and effort, but , and lots of .

and support, while online reviews frame the grading and workload as much harsher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The work is mostly standard English reading and essays, but the volume and .

effort, while online reviews describe the workload as much more difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

and discussion but do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews refer to class discussion and attendance-taking, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

60/100

He is recommended by students who value writing improvement and support, but others warn about rude treatment and .

, while both online reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or , though revisions and late-work leniency can soften the impact.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention revisions and late work, while online reviews emphasize criticism and harshness.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The course regularly , and homework, including some break assignments.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy work, with online reviews sounding more severe.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

Many students find him caring, funny, and helpful, but others report rude or belittling behavior and .

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are mixed but recently strong, while online reviews are consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats support an assignment-heavy structure, especially .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but recently positive, with praise for care, humor, revisions, and .

Main concern

The and a .

What students said

“YOU have to put in the effort into the work and essays.”
EN1A
“He grades hard but get the grade you want.”
ENGL4
“ don't get offended lol.”
EN1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are very negative, , and high dropout pressure.

Main concern

Online students report feeling criticized rather than supported.

What students said

“more than 70% who sign up for .”
EN1A
“he does nothing but criticize.”
EN4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and revisions, and they do not clearly prove exam .

Essay-Based GradeRevisions AllowedNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as the main graded work and revisions as available, but do not clearly prove traditional exam policies.

Essay-Based GradeRevisions Allowed
“ . No other hw.”
ENGL4
“ if needed”
ENG4
“most of your grade is based off of your essays.”
EN1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He grades hard but get the grade you want.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“ .”

⚖️

32/100

“He almost never gives out A for them But he does let you revise them 'till the end.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

60/100

“100% recommend this class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !! he really cares about his students.
  • .
  • he was rude to me, i dropped the class

Theme 2

📚 About Reading And Writing

  • Overall get ready to read a bit and get .
  • There were 4 essays that we ended up doing.
  • You have to be prepared to read and read and read

Theme 3

⚖️

  • He grades hard but get the grade you want.
  • if needed
  • I literally did it still gave me 0/150

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews give useful detail across formats and years, though opinions are polarized and the online sample is small.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

EN1A11 reviews
EN42 reviews
ENG42 reviews
ENGL42 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1