AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charlene Weiser

MATHMATH · MTH65AND55 · MATH65 · MATH1 · MTH20 · MATH20 · MATH55 · MTH2 · MTH255 · MTH55 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
68.75%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Charlene Weiser if you want strong math instruction and are ready to keep up with , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear math instructionTest heavyLots of practiceCaring and approachableFast-paced at times
  • , and willingness to help.
  • The course is usually test-heavy and .
  • Students weak in math often benefit from her support, but fast pace and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A good grade is realistic if you keep up with homework and study, but an easy A.

, while the only online review says grades depend mostly on tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

Her explanations make math easier to follow, but the pace, volume of material, and .

, while the only online review describes long lectures and time pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say missing class makes success much harder.

, while online evidence does not clearly address attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, though some avoid her because of tough grading and test-heavy structure.

, while the one online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Grading is often viewed as fair if students prepare, but and .

Format shift

, while the online review says tests dominate the grade.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Homework and practice can be substantial, but students often say the work directly prepares them for quizzes and exams.

Format shift

In-person workload is steady and practice-heavy, while the online but .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students say , and effective at explaining math.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is strong, while the single online review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and finals, with homework often used mainly as practice or completion credit.

Format shift

Both formats point toward exam-heavy assessment, especially the online review and several in-person math reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and exam preparation through homework and quizzes.

Main concern

The main risk is falling behind in a .

What students said

“Will prepare you well for next level math if you pay attention & do the work.”
MTH255
“ , which requires LOTS of studying.”
MATH1
“ if .”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and says the , and .

Main concern

The only online review warns against the class because .

What students said

“bestie dont do it.”
MTH2
“only grades tests, a lot of lectures are 2 hrs long.”
MTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard-to-strict because and some reviews mention no calculators or cheat sheets.

No CalculatorsNo Cheat SheetsTest HeavyFormula Memorization

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or cheat sheets in at least one course, but not proctoring details.

No CalculatorsNo Cheat SheetsTest HeavyFinals
“no calculators allowed or cheatsheets for formulas”
MTH255
“ ”
MATH1
“There is only 4 exams throughout the semester worth 100 points each.”
MATH55

Online

The only online review and mentions quizzes and unit tests, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Tests OnlyMultiple-Choice QuizzesUnit Tests
“ ”
MTH2
“ " and .”
MTH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Will prepare you well for next level math if you pay attention & do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and math support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Her lectures are really easy to follow because of her guided lecture packets.”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“I cannot say enough about her. She is EXCELLENT.”

🧪

36/100

“ , which requires LOTS of studying.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and makes sure you really understand concepts.
  • She is very structured.
  • She answers all questions and she encourages us to ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you keep up with , the exams are not too hard.
  • Do not procrastinate studying or homework. Also, no calculators.
  • if you get the right answer.

Theme 3

🧮 About Math Support

  • Actually made my math anxiety disappear--feel prepped for MTH21.
  • If you're not very good at math, she'll be perfect for you.
  • She helps you understand the core concepts and she's so encouraging and kind.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 30 reviews with strong detail and a .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH5512 reviews
MTH24 reviews
MTH554 reviews
MATH203 reviews
MATH12 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH651 review
MATHMATH1 review
MTH201 review
MTH2551 review
MTH65AND551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1