AI Rate Professor

Electronic Engineering Technol

Jason Correa

ESYS54 · ESYS50 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Strongly recommended for students who want a and strong support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHands-On LearningHelpful InstructorExtra CreditFair GradingInclusive Classroom
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his clear, hands-on teaching style.
  • , and willing to help struggling students.
  • Grades are generally fair and often high, with and lenient coursework mentioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

High grades are common because he grades fairly, offers , and gives support, though participation and labs still matter.

Online reviews mention lenient coursework, while , and hands-on lab participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Technical material is made easier through clear explanations, hands-on demos, resources, and active help.

Online reviews praise learning resources, while in-person reviews most strongly emphasize hands-on demonstrations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

as strictly mandatory, but , and group work make showing up valuable.

and participation more than online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and invested in student success.

Both online and being much broader.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report fair grading, , lenient coursework, and lots of consideration.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lenient coursework, while and .

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload includes labs, projects, reading, and participation, but students generally find it manageable and well supported.

Format shift

and projects, while online reviews describe lenient coursework and engaging resources.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and supportive.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and hands-on work rather than exams.

Format shift

and lab assessment, while online reviews mention coursework but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, helpfulness, and supportive classroom style.

Main concern

Some early course materials may have been rough while he was new to teaching.

What students said

“He grades fairly and gives a lot of consideration.”
ESYS50
“ .”
ESYS54

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are very positive, emphasizing engaging resources, inclusive teaching, and a fun supportive class environment.

Main concern

Participation still matters even when coursework is lenient.

What students said

“He hosts a very inclusive environment and is lenient with coursework”
ESYS50
“HE SHARE ALL OF HIS KNOWLEDGE WITH HIS STUDENTS ALSO MAKE THE CLASSES FUNNY IN A GOOD WAY”
ESYS54

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and assessment appears more coursework and lab focused than exam focused.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyCoursework And Lab Focus

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation but do not clearly prove exam policies.

Hands-On ProjectsLabsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ .”
ESYS54
“ ”
ESYS54

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you get the feeling that he is rooting for you to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He makes the lessons easy to understand because he provides many different resources.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ future!”

⚖️

90/100

“He grades fairly and gives a lot of consideration.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the lessons easy to understand because he provides many different resources.
  • You can ask him any question and he will answer you in a way that you can understand.
  • HILARIOUS, INSPIRATIONAL, AND KNOWLEDGEABLE.

Theme 2

🛠️ About Hands-On Learning

  • .
  • It was great to learn by doing.
  • and demonstrative of the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He hepls students in any situation, no matter how difficult it is.
  • he's empathetic to working students' struggles and very reasonable.
  • you get the feeling that he is rooting for you to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen recent reviews are highly consistent, detailed, and supported by both online and in-person evidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESYS5410 reviews
ESYS505 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4