AI Rate Professor

History

Kathryn Eigen

HIST7 · HISTORY7 · HIS7 · HISTORY8 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
43.75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready for , and demanding test preparation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReading HeavyTough GraderAttendance CriticalTest HeavyMixed Lecturer
  • Students repeatedly , and demanding exams.
  • , and several students say missing class can seriously hurt performance.
  • Some students praise her lectures, but many say she makes manageable history material unnecessarily difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible for disciplined students, but , and heavy exam preparation.

Online has one straightforward A report but , while in-person evidence more strongly shows hard work for grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

History content may be manageable, but the , and exams make the course feel hard.

Online reviews cite weekly quizzes and exams, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Multiple in-person reviews say attendance is graded or essential, and .

, while online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because many students describe her as demanding, nitpicky, test-heavy, and difficult despite some strong lecture praise.

Online reviews are mixed, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or , and attendance.

Format shift

Online mentions point deductions and tough quizzes, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload often includes heavy weekly , and attendance-based learning.

Format shift

Online workload is weekly discussions, quizzes, midterm, and final, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise her lectures, but many say she is unclear, belittling, overly demanding, or makes history harder than needed.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed, while comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews repeatedly , and .

Format shift

Both formats show quizzes and midterms and final essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized but often warn , and tough exams.

Main concern

The class can feel harder because of , and .

What students said

“40 to 50 pages to be read weekly for the quiz.”
HIST7
“ .”
HIS7

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with one straightforward recent review and and exams.

Main concern

Weekly work and .

What students said

“1 discussion and and 1 midterm 1 final.”
HIS7
“She's very nit-picky.”
HIS7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews describe weekly quizzes, midterms, finals, essay exams, and heavy memorization, but .

Weekly QuizzesMidtermFinalEssay ExamsHeavy Memorization

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support weekly quizzes, midterms, finals, essay-style testing, and , but not proctoring or .

Weekly QuizzesMidtermsFinal ExamEssay QuestionsAttendance-Dependent Exams
“It and .”
HISTORY8
“She has 2 midterms (10 multiple choice with 4 essay questions, you choose from 7), and .”
HISTORY8

Online

, and a final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Weekly QuizzesMidtermFinalHeavy Memorization
“1 discussion and and 1 midterm 1 final.”
HIS7
“For mid-term and text book.”
HISTORY8

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The material was easy, the professor is the problem”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“The material was easy, the professor is the problem”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“40 to 50 pages to be read weekly for the quiz.”

📝

25/100

“For mid-term and text book.”

Theme 1

📚 About Reading And Workload

  • Expect to read a lot 40 to 50 pages nightly
  • 40 to 50 pages to be read weekly for the quiz.
  • guide less than a week before a midterm and the final.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • It and .
  • Shes a and .
  • For mid-term and text book.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a really good lecturer.
  • She is very hardworking teacher with .
  • Makes history hard.

Theme 4

🚪

  • ?
  • SHOWING UP IS KEY.
  • Everything on the so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years give , and divided teaching opinions.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HISTORY87 reviews
HIS75 reviews
HISTORY74 reviews
HIST73 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2