AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Rosa Landeros

CAS001 · CAS88A · CAS58 · CAS54A · CAS50 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
64.71%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a structured, mostly easy computer course and and assignment expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A With WorkAttendance StrictClear GradingMixed Teaching QualityHelpful But Controlling
  • Many students say the class is easy if , and keep retrying work until it is correct.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply split, with many strong recommendations and several harsh complaints about control, help, and technology knowledge.
  • Attendance and task compliance matter a lot, especially in person, so the class is not ideal for students who want flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is very realistic if , and accept redo-heavy work expectations.

Online reviews often call the course straightforward and doable, while to showing up and doing all work.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Most comments describe the content as simple, straightforward, and not hard, even when they criticize the instructor.

Both formats describe easy content, though and classroom control.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

skipping class can make students fail or be dropped.

, while online evidence is mixed and includes one complaint about attendance during shutdown.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but the volume of harsh complaints prevents a higher recommendation score.

Online reviews are mostly favorable after 2022 but include serious outliers, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are often high and students repeatedly say doing the work leads to an A, though .

Format shift

Online grading has stricter complaints about deadlines and 100 percent task expectations, while and complete work.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload is usually described as low, straightforward, and assignment-based, though some reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

Online workload is often called low and doable, while , and attendance demands.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, with many students calling her helpful and excellent while others describe poor technology skill, excessive talking, and weak support.

Format shift

Online reviews trend more positive on responsiveness, while in-person reviews include stronger complaints about classroom management and technical competence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear driven mainly by homework, summaries, projects, MyITLab tasks, discussions, and a .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes Pearson or MyITLab assignments, while , and hands-on Office work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show an easy path to an A through attendance and completed work, but , and weak technical teaching.

Main concern

and a controlled classroom style frustrate students who want independence.

What students said

“Show up to class, do your work and get an "A".”
CAS50
“ but that's perfectly fine, how do you learn if you don't attend class.”
CAS50
“Doesn't like technology, teaches a technology class”
CAS50

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive , and easy grades, but several warn about cost, strict deadlines, limited help, and demanding redo policies.

Main concern

Online students may need paid Pearson access and may get little flexibility on due dates or .

What students said

“Friendly, straightforward, and easy.”
CAS50
“The workload is low and you do learn with MyITLab.”
CAS50
“I had to purchase Pearson, the learning material for this class, to complete assignments.”
CAS50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because , and a very easy final, with most grading tied to assignments.

Few TestsNo MidtermVery Easy FinalAssignment-Focused

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring details.

Few TestsNo MidtermVery Easy Final
“ . .”
CAS50
“Tests? Not many”
CAS50

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, do your work and get an "A".”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Awesome class! Awesome instructor!”

📈 Easy A Path

84/100

“Just do all your work and you will get an A.”

⚠️

18/100

“ so make sure you are there or .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy. TAKE HER CLASS!!
  • and get an A.
  • The and simple.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great online class. Learned a lot.
  • .
  • She talks way too much though, getting sidetracked into a story frequently.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure & Control

  • If you don't want to show up to my class, then I'm going to fail you.
  • Students have to try so many times to get 100% done
  • She expects everyone to have read the chapter entirely before coming to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

There are 43 reviews across many years and both formats, with enough detail to identify consistent strengths, risks, and format differences.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CAS5036 reviews
CAS584 reviews
CAS0011 review
CAS54A1 review
CAS88A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 1 · A 26

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1