AI Rate Professor

Art

Sung Kim

ART2A · ART3A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and can handle high expectations, especially in person.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrong feedbackTalented artistHigh expectationsLots of drawingFormat-dependent
  • In-person students praise Kim as , and strong at critique.
  • The online review describes the intro class as extremely difficult with too little guidance.
  • Grades are not an easy A path, especially for beginners or online students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Getting an A is not easy because reviews describe high expectations, lots of drawing, and one student directly says it is hard to get an A.

The online review strongly lowers the score, while but still serious effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course can be demanding for beginners because assignments are intricate and expectations are high.

Online evidence shows much higher difficulty, while guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and attention appear important.

, so the evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and serious art growth, but not for online beginners seeking an easy grade.

, while the single online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Kim appears fair and not art-school harsh in person, but the online review calls him a and says an A is hard.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence suggests reasonable grading with strong critique.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload appears substantial because , and high expectations.

Format shift

Online work feels especially heavy, while but more supported.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Kim receives strong praise for talent, critique, and individual attention, but the online review reports weak guidance for difficult assignments.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised strongly, while online teaching appears less beginner-friendly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based art work rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and emphasize individual critique, talent, organization, and meaningful improvement.

Main concern

There is lots of drawing and students need to pay attention to benefit fully.

What students said

“Has wonderful, genuine critique for each individual.”
ART3A
“lots of drawing, less lecture.”
ART3A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative, saying the intro class was too difficult and lacked enough guidance for beginners.

Main concern

Online beginners may struggle with intricate assignments and high expectations.

What students said

“Introduction class was extremely difficult, especially while taking online.”
ART2A
“Hard to get an A if that is your goal.”
ART2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do , and the course appears mainly assignment and critique based.

No clear exam evidenceAssignment-focused course

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy and focus instead on drawing, critique, and feedback.

Drawing workCritique
“lots of drawing, less lecture.”
ART3A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very kind and works individually with students to improve whether or not they have a background in art.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in format differences, critique, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

76/100

“Has wonderful, genuine critique for each individual.”

Difficulty And Grades

45/100

“Hard to get an A if that is your goal.”

Workload Intensity

34/100

“lots of drawing, less lecture.”

Theme 1

Feedback And Critique

  • and he is very talented
  • good feedback, .

Theme 2

Difficulty And Expectations

  • I felt that he expected far too much from students who have likely never took an art class before.
  • there was a lack of guidance for the intricate assignments.

Theme 3

In-Person Learning

  • Takes the time to learn about what each student's struggles.
  • pay attention, lots to learn from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and clearly show a format split.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART3A2 reviews
ART2A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values