AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hung T. Dinh

MATH43 · MATH37 · MATH65 · MATH105 · MATH4 · MATH65A · MTH43 · MTH53 · MATH6 · MATH55 · MAN105 · MTH65 · MATH104 · MTH55 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are disciplined, attend consistently, and can handle a lecture-heavy math class with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework heavyLecture heavyFair if you attendPolarizing teaching styleStrict with questions
  • Students are sharply and and condescending.
  • Grades can be strong for , and keep up with .
  • The main risk is a heavy lecture-and-homework style with limited flexibility and little in newer reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with , and test preparation, but students do not describe it as low-effort.

Online evidence shows repeated homework attempts but timed assessments, while and consistent work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students but often feels harder because lectures can be fast, repetitive, or confusing.

Online courses lean more self-paced through videos and MathLab, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say skipping class makes passing unlikely.

Online reviews do not clearly show attendance rules, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend him when they value structure and , but many warn against him because of and harsh interactions.

Online reviews are mixed but slightly less harsh, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading is usually described as fair or , but newer reviews mention no and strict expectations.

Format shift

Online grading includes repeated homework attempts but tougher timed assessments, while to stricter recent comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and lecture demands make the workload consistently heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize multiple weekly online assignments, while and attendance pressure.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with clear structure for some students and .

Format shift

Online reviews praise some guided homework lectures but include self-teaching complaints, while and frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and finals rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention MathLab homework plus timed quizzes and exams, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with and homework while others report , strictness, and condescending answers.

Main concern

Students who miss class, need flexible help, or dislike long lectures may struggle.

What students said

“Extremely doable if you put in the effort.”
MATH37
“ if you learn on your own.”
MATH55
“Lectures were very boring and confusing.”
MATH4

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with good lecture structure and but and heavy MathLab work.

Main concern

Online students may need to teach themselves when long videos and MathLab dominate the class.

What students said

“His lecture composed of doing the and it's really easy to follow along since it's just with different numbers.”
MATH43
“The homework is okay, you get 2 attempts per answer, but the quizzes and because they're timed with only 1 attempt.”
MATH6
“Basically taught myself how to do everything.”
MTH43

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention timed online quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Timed Online AssessmentsOne Attempt Quizzes And ExamsMultiple MidtermsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

QuizzesMidtermsFinal ExamTests
“3 quizzes, 3 mid terms, and 1 final.”
MATH6
“Just study for the final and quizzes.”
MATH43

Online

Online reviews mention timed quizzes and exams with only one attempt, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Timed Online AssessmentsOne Attempt Quizzes And Exams
“the quizzes and because they're timed with only 1 attempt.”
MATH6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely doable if you put in the effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Lectures were very boring and confusing.”

📈 Effort For Grades

58/100

“I got an A in the class, but I had to work really hard for it.”

⚖️

55/100

“As long as you came to class and took notes, Professor Dinh was a great and fair teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He can be very unhelpful and disrespectful when students ask questions.
  • He really knows his stuff, and do the homework.
  • He speaks fast and is hard to understand.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There were multiple homework assignments a week each taking at least an hour to complete.
  • Gives a lot of hw so get ahead.
  • The Pearson Hw has practice problems, which are similar to the hw.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Extremely doable if you put in the effort.
  • !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 41 reviews across many years with , and grading.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH559 reviews
MTH557 reviews
MATH65A5 reviews
MATH654 reviews
MATH433 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1052 reviews
MATH372 reviews
MATH62 reviews
MTH652 reviews
MAN1051 review
MATH1041 review
MATH41 review
MTH431 review
MTH531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 2