AI Rate Professor

Engineering & Math

Sepehr Nesaei

ENGR36 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no alternative and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedHarsh graderUnclear instructionsClass time wastedAvoid strongly
  • All three reviews are extremely negative and , and wasted class time.
  • Students say he argues with students, does not answer questions directly, and appears unfamiliar with the course content.
  • as harsh, making the course both difficult and unrewarding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and weak instructional support.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels challenging mainly because and students report that he does not know or .

All course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , but and poorly used.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they discuss class .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students unanimously advise against taking him because of , and hostile classroom interactions.

All and is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students explicitly describe harsh and .

Format shift

, and they describe it negatively.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not fully detailed, but the course feels heavy because and high expectations increase effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and and expectations rather than assignment volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe him as unprepared, unfamiliar with the , and unwilling to answer questions directly.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention labs, group work, and grading but do not provide enough detail to identify a dominant assessment method.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, describing unclear teaching, , and little useful support.

Main concern

Students report that and arguments reduce actual learning time.

What students said

“He is entirely unfamiliar with the content of the course.”
Engr36
“Just save yourself”
Engr36
“ and because of his heated arguments with students.”
Engr36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please follow the other reviewers advice and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“He is entirely unfamiliar with the content of the course.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“Just save yourself”

⚖️

10/100

“He grades harshly and not thoroughly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and because of his heated arguments with students.
  • He is unprepared and doesn't know what lectures go over.
  • He doesn't answer questions directly when they are asked.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Literally spends the majority of class arguing with one student, and practically bullying him.
  • Peter wastes class time by arguing with students who disagree with his teaching style.
  • Just save yourself

Theme 3

📉 About Grades And Difficulty

  • He grades harshly and not thoroughly.
  • He has high expectations and doesn't answer questions directly when they are asked.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, but they are recent, detailed enough, and completely consistent in their negative judgment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

Engr363 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3