AI Rate Professor

Health, P.E. & Athletics

Begona Cirera Perez

NUTRITION1 · NUT01ONLINE · NUT1 · NUTR1 · NUTR001 · NUT1ON1 · HEALTH1 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
72.22%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want to learn a lot and , and limited tolerance for missed deadlines.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring But DemandingHeavy ReadingTime ConsumingClear ExpectationsPolarizing Grader
  • Most positive students value her care, organization, and meaningful learning.
  • Negative students focus on , and .
  • Online reviews show more workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students can earn A grades, but the , and deadlines rather than low effort.

Online reviews show heavier workload and stricter pacing, while feels worth it.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is manageable but , and sometimes hard because of dense nutrition concepts and many tasks.

Online sections feel more time-consuming and self-directed, while as clearer and more engaging.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance or participation expectations vary, with online discussions functioning as attendance and if all work is done.

, while in-person evidence is more flexible but still work-dependent.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and meaningful learning, but a significant minority strongly warn about workload, grading, and communication.

, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

because students mention harsh criteria, no late work, no , and delayed grade visibility despite many A and B outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews contain stronger harsh-grading complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy, especially online, with repeated reports of weekly readings, long , and diet analysis.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavier and more repetitive, while but less often described as overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Teaching is generally strong and caring, but polarized by students who felt unsupported, talked down to, or left to learn from the book.

Format shift

, while online feedback ranges from life-changing support to severe frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and projects rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more discussions and quizzes, while , and general coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally warmer, emphasizing passion, help, and learning, though and poor grade communication.

Main concern

The main in-person concern is that the class is not easy and can feel unfair when grades or .

What students said

“Her class wasn't easy, but it wasn't physics either.”
NUTR1
“hard work but ”
NUTR001
“No communication at all”
HEALTH1

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are highly split, with many praising care and structure but many , and grading issues.

Main concern

Online students most often , and not seeing grades clearly during the term.

What students said

“SO MUCH UNNECESSARY WORK...”
NUT1
“You really have to study the material to get a good grade.”
NUTR1
“ and 2 attempts for .”
NUT1ON1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are important and sometimes hard or fast, but reviews do not clearly .

Quizzes And ExamsTimed Exams MentionedStudy Guides MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or take-home policies.

Study Guides MentionedTough Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“the ”
NUT1
“if you read the book and exams”
NUTR001
“She gave study guides and really wanted us to learn the subject.”
NUTR1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, timing pressure, and study guides, but do not clearly .

Quizzes And ExamsTimed Exams MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The not enough time.”
1
“basically a ”
NUTR1
“She gave us study guides for exams”
NUTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't want .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ and passionate.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“There are weekly ch. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Her class wasn't easy, but it wasn't physics either. I had to study, but I expected that for science course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and passionate.
  • Her class is great. I learned a lot. Well-organized and clear.
  • I cannot physically express how poor of a teacher she is. I learned LITERALLY NOTHING.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You really have to study the material to get a good grade.
  • No grades until end of term you cant track your progress
  • Got a FAST A!!!

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • SO MUCH UNNECESSARY WORK...
  • The discussions were mandatory, took about 3 hrs a week to complete
  • Stay ontop of your work. Her class was not hard, very time consuming.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • She obviously cares and takes her time to help you.
  • She went further than any college teacher ever has to help me.
  • Professor Begona doesn't care for her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, , and organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

NUTR123 reviews
HEALTH16 reviews
NUT15 reviews
NUT1ON15 reviews
NUTRITION14 reviews
Show 3 more courses
NUT01ONLINE3 reviews
NUTR0013 reviews
11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 4

B range

15

B+ 8 · B 7

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2