AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thuylan Rouland

MATH54 · MATH20 · MATH37 · MTH43 · MATHS43 · MATH54L · MATH55 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATH22 · FFFFFFFFFFFFFF · MATH43 · MTH65A · MATH31 · MTH37 · MATH · MTH1 · MATH105 · MTH65 · MTH55 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
26.32%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and and the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecture paceHeavy homeworkHard examsConfusing explanationsFair but limited support
  • Many students say lectures move too fast and often require self-teaching from the book.
  • and .
  • Some students find her nice and fair, but the overall recommendation rate is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible for strong or highly prepared students, but most comments , and a .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels difficult because , and exams can differ from practice work.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students repeatedly say you need to attend class, keep up with notes, and if you want to pass.

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because they find the , and the exams risky.

The because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some reviews call her fair or not super tough, but many warn that tests and few graded items make grades unforgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of across years and courses.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person math courses.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often describe her as nice and knowledgeable but say her explanations are fast, confusing, repetitive, or .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, with no online comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are described as relying heavily on tests plus homework, with few alternative assignments or buffers.

Format shift

, and few graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and show a recurring pattern of , and mixed but often negative teaching experiences.

Main concern

Students who need clear step-by-step support often struggle badly.

What students said

“Many people in my class self taught a bunch of the subjects because we couldn't understand the in class stuff.”
MATH22
“She flies through lectures, examples are terrible, assigns HW last minute and makes you submit everything via PDF scans so you are writing A LOT.”
MATH31
“ and very complicated to understand.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report , and limited alignment between lectures, homework, and exams.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyFew Graded ItemsNo Clear Review

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Hard TestsFew Graded ItemsTest Heavy
“ and very complicated to understand.”
MATH20
“ and the format was straightforward.”
MATH37
“she decided that we all cheated even though we didn't and .”
MATH31

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Many people in my class self taught a bunch of the subjects because we couldn't understand the in class stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“She knows her material, but not how to teach it.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Assigns a ton of homework.”

🧪

28/100

“ and very complicated to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures as if her students should know what she is teaching already.
  • She rushes through the material and expects you to understand immediately.
  • When she was actually teaching new things she was fine, but she would always waste half the class going over stuff that did not matter.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only tests and .
  • You really need to study to pass this class, about 40% dropped out.
  • so your only way of passing the class is if you pass the tests!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very nice and willing to help, not a .
  • She has an accent but was fairly easy to understand and her quirks were pretty funny!
  • She is a good teacher that really tries to make sure everyone understands the work by giving many examples and formulas.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 in-person reviews over a long time span with highly , and clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 511
3 out of 515
2 out of 513
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH378 reviews
MATH317 reviews
MATH555 reviews
MATH204 reviews
MATH224 reviews
Show 16 more courses
MATH434 reviews
MTH372 reviews
MTH432 reviews
MTH552 reviews
209411 review
651 review
COLLEGEALGEBRA1 review
FFFFFFFFFFFFFF1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1051 review
MATH541 review
MATH54L1 review
MATHS431 review
MTH11 review
MTH651 review
MTH65A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2