AI Rate Professor

Engineering & Math

Tess Weathers

ENG25 · ENGR25 · ENGR10 · ENGR45 · ENGR36 · ENGR22 · ENG22 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
68%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Tess Weathers if you want a challenging engineering course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkCaring but demandingTough graderUseful office hoursLate grading
  • Students consistently report a heavy workload with and projects.
  • Teaching quality is split, with many praising her care and office hours while .
  • Grades are possible with effort, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students , and a need to truly understand the material.

Both formats report A outcomes, but online reviews stress time-consuming assignments while and exams.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The engineering content is challenging, especially MATLAB, coding, and .

Online students with coding experience found it more manageable, while and high challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because reviews mention participation, classwork, daily quizzes, and skipping class hurting performance.

The attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews do .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend her when they value challenge and support, but many warn against the , and .

Online and in-person reviews are both mixed, with and in-person complaints focused on lecture clarity and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students often call her a tough or hard grader despite some and partial credit opportunities.

Format shift

wording in in-person engineering reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and reading are repeatedly described as long and time-consuming.

Format shift

Both online and in-person students report heavy work, with online students emphasizing weekly assignment time.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

She is often described as caring and knowledgeable, but lecture clarity and .

Format shift

Online reviews say she struggled more with clarity online, while and poor lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades , and exams rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and projects, while , and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

strong support for motivated students and frustration from students who need clearer lectures.

Main concern

The workload and .

What students said

“ though and you have to be good at the material to get an A.”
ENGR25
“She is a very caring teacher, and that's a very rare trait.”
ENGR36

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise her knowledge and support but and .

Main concern

Online and feedback.

What students said

“The lectures and .”
ENGR25
“ .”
ENG22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments suggest open-note or , though and material-heavy.

Open Note ExamsHomework Allowed On ExamsMaterial-Heavy ExamsNot Test Heavy Online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention open-note exams and , but also describe hard and .

Open Note ExamsHomework Allowed On ExamsMaterial-Heavy Exams
“ and .”
ENGR25
“The .”
ENGR22

Online

Online reviews do not , but one review says the class is not test heavy.

Not Test Heavy
“ , but expect to work on assignments for 2 days every week.”
ENGR25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Weathers is wonderful. She truly wants us to succeed as engineers in the real world so she always provides the level of challenge that we're likely to see at uni.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“She is a very caring teacher, and that's a very rare trait.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“She also gives a lot of homework and all of it is time consuming.”

⚖️

30/100

“ though and you have to be good at the material to get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were fine but she gives a lot of HW.
  • Her recorded lectures are iffy, but she has good office hours.
  • She'll answer all of your questions and is a very accessible professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a good amount of homework but it's doable if you budget time right.
  • You wont know your grade until the end of the semester because .
  • but arent harder than the HW problems.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • !
  • The professor and tutors answer all your questions on the Discord app/website & in .
  • She truly wants us to succeed as engineers in the real world.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 25 reviews across several years, with , and support.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGR2513 reviews
ENGR363 reviews
ENG252 reviews
ENGR102 reviews
ENGR222 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGR452 reviews
ENG221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1