AI Rate Professor

Computer Application Systems

Chung-Wen Albert Tsao

CSCI7 · CSCI41 · CS411 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are highly self-taught and , and limited feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesPoor explanationsHeavy self-teachingHarsh or broken gradingLow learning value
  • Most students describe the teaching as unclear, disorganized, and .
  • Several reviews say quizzes, , demos, or instructions contain mistakes that hurt learning.
  • A few students earned A grades, but comments suggest this often reflects weak checking or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students report A grades and one says the class is easy, but most comments show students need self-teaching and .

Online evidence sounds harder and more frustrating, while but is outweighed by many negative in-person comments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

27/100

The content becomes difficult because , and students often have to learn from reading or outside help.

Both formats describe confusion, with online reviews emphasizing broken materials and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance and participation seem important because students say questions and class participation are needed to understand anything.

Both formats provide limited policy evidence, but to pass or understand.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students warn against taking him because they learn little and find the and disorganized.

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews mention tough or and broken quizzes, though a few A grades suggest outcomes can still be high for self-sufficient students.

Format shift

Both formats include tough-grader signals, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention lots of , and extra self-study caused by unclear teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention lots of homework and wrong lab keys, while and self-teaching.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The dominant pattern is unclear lectures, poor explanations, disorganization, mistakes, and .

Format shift

Both formats report poor teaching, with in-person reviews more numerous and severe.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention labs, homework, quizzes, , and class participation, but do not show a .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions labs and homework, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly very negative, with repeated complaints about , and low learning value.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they learn little from him and .

What students said

“ . You will learn nothing from him.”
CSCI41
“He grades very harsh, reads off a .”
CSCI41
“ , so reading before the next class is the only way you will understand any of what he says.”
CSCI41

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing confusing , and little useful support.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves because lectures and materials are .

What students said

“You don't really learn much in his class.”
CSCI7
“his lab are usually wrong/impossible to do.”
CSCI41
“I can't focus in this class its quite too difficult...”
CSCI41

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support problematic quizzes and do not clearly prove exam .

Quizzes With Reported ErrorsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Quizzes With Reported Errors
“ and he puts no effort forward to make the learning experience in his class better.”
CSCI41
“Students literally need to correct so the right answers are actually right.”
CSCI41

Online

Online reviews mention lab and class difficulty but do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . You will learn nothing from him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation warnings; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He reads off of the over the place, and doesn't speak English clearly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ serious.”

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

27/100

“ , so reading before the next class is the only way you will understand any of what he says.”

⚖️

28/100

“He grades very harsh, reads off a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You don't really learn much in his class.
  • He also is horrible at explaining concepts and will go out of his way to solve problems in his own way without actually following the same instructions he provided.
  • professor seems like he did not prepare his materials before lecturing his .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and he puts no effort forward to make the learning experience in his class better.
  • his lab are usually wrong/impossible to do.
  • , so reading before the next class is the only way you will understand any of what he says.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • IF YOU ARE TRYING TO ACTUALLY LEARN.
  • . You will learn nothing from him.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across several years are highly consistent in , and low recommendation value.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 512

Course coverage

CSCI4111 reviews
CSCI72 reviews
CS4111 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2