AI Rate Professor

English

Thomas De Wit

EN1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if and feedback, but be aware in-person support has one conflicting report.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear gradingStrong feedbackAccessibleRespectfulMixed in-person support
  • , and forgiving grading.
  • and one serious complaint about poor support.
  • The course appears easy to manage when expectations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A looks very realistic because online reviews mention forgiving grading and detailed rubrics, though .

Online evidence supports an easy A more strongly, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The EN1 content seems manageable because , and interesting topics rather than hard concepts.

Online reviews make the course sound smoother, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, but participation matters appears and one hybrid review suggests access outside a strict classroom model.

, so the judgment is based only on limited tag evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend him because , and grading-friendly.

Online reviews are consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

because one online student says he dismissed a disappointing grade so students could earn a decent grade.

Format shift

Online comments strongly support lenient grading, while .

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload does not appear heavy because reviews focus on rubrics, essays, and .

Format shift

Neither format gives detailed workload complaints, so confidence is moderate.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Teaching is mostly praised for , and useful examples, despite one negative in-person review.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very strong, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, assignments, rubrics, and .

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest assignment-based evidence; but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with one praising accessibility and one saying help and .

Main concern

Support may vary by section or student experience.

What students said

“Class was hybrid but the .”
EN1
“Hard to reach out for help and .”
EN1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe clear teaching, detailed rubrics, useful examples, and .

Main concern

No major online concern appears in the reviews.

What students said

“he was very respectful and ”
EN1
“he gave really descriptive rubrics and ”
EN1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring policy, or open-book rule.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he was very respectful and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“he was very respectful and ”

⚖️

88/100

“he also had a if there was a grade you were not proud of he would dismiss it for you”

🧭 Support Consistency

65/100

“Hard to reach out for help and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was very respectful and
  • The topics were interesting as well.

Theme 2

📄

  • he gave really descriptive rubrics and
  • Class was hybrid but the .
  • Hard to reach out for help and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews give useful detail, but the sample is small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EN14 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values