AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sooji Sohr

MATH253 · MATH203 · MATH43 · MTH43 · MTH53 · PRECAL1 · MATH13 · MATH47 · MTH104 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math, self-directed, and comfortable with and fast lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture heavyFast pacedUnclear directionsPoor communication
  • Many students warn against taking her because lectures, directions, and .
  • Grades can be earned with hard work, but students , and heavy effort.
  • A minority of students , and willingness to help after class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students , and many hours rather than low effort.

Online reviews make the A path , while in-person reviews show some A outcomes for students who work hard.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content feels challenging because students describe fast pacing, confusing notes, overcomplicated explanations, and .

Both formats report confusion, with online reviews emphasizing self-teaching and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students say missing class hurts badly and one review mentions mandatory collaborations.

, while online evidence mentions required collaboration only indirectly through one review labeled in person by the authoritative count.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

because they report unclear teaching, poor communication, harsh tone, and .

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

because many reviews call her a , and graded by few things.

Format shift

Both formats report strict assessment, with online reviews adding pop quizzes and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy because students repeatedly mention lots of , and many hours.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and tests, while , and heavy studying.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because , and unclear communication despite some positive reports.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very negative, while but mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment appears exam-heavy because , and grades depending on a few exams.

Format shift

Online reviews cite tests and pop quizzes, while , and few graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative but mixed, with repeated complaints about , and unclear lectures alongside a few strong endorsements.

Main concern

The biggest risk is confusing fast-paced instruction paired with strict or .

What students said

“Lots of and extremely strict.”
MTH104
“She make simple stuff overcomplicated and ”
MATH43
“If you study you'll pass with an A!”
MATH43

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unclear , and pop quizzes.

Main concern

Students and communication is poor.

What students said

“ ”
MATH203
“you will be teaching yourself”
MATH203

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies, with repeated test-heavy complaints but and .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTake-Home TestsCheat SheetsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and take-home tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyFinal ExamCheat SheetsTake-Home Tests
“your grade is heavily dependent on the 3 tests and 1 final”
MATH43
“Expect cheat sheets. Expect .”
MATH43

Online

Online reviews mention tests and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Test HeavyPop Quizzes
“Test heavy”
MATH203
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH203

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She moves to fast and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She make simple stuff overcomplicated and ”

⚖️

25/100

“Lots of and extremely strict.”

🧪

82/100

“your grade is heavily dependent on the 3 tests and 1 final”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . She moves to fast and .
  • .
  • She has a way of explaining that really helps you understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Working hard and being respectful will get you an A.
  • The class was difficult in the beginning. You do have to put a lot of hours.
  • The , but nothing you can't handle!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication & Tone

  • horrible at communicating with students
  • called the class immature.
  • never answers her emails her tests do not correlate to the notes or book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years provide detailed and mostly consistent concerns, with enough positive outliers to show nuance.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH437 reviews
MATH2032 reviews
MTH1042 reviews
PRECAL12 reviews
MATH131 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH2531 review
math471 review
MTH431 review
MTH531 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1