AI Rate Professor

Engineering & Math

Daniel Scharff

ENGR11 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with and want a low-stress engineering class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardProject-Based LabsFun ClassLow DifficultyTextbook Not Required
  • The class and a .
  • An A appears very reachable with basic effort despite the reviewer earning a C.
  • The instructor tries to make the class fun and does not rely heavily on the textbook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A seems very doable with steady participation and project effort, even though the reviewer did not personally earn one.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course seems intellectually light because projects dominate and the reviewer rated difficulty low.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters, but the review does .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

The because the class is manageable and the professor tries to make it fun.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The reviewer says an A was possible with more effort, suggesting forgiving grading for students who complete the work.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

76/100

The class has major projects plus weekly reports and , but as less important.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

The instructor is viewed as engaging and makes the class more enjoyable.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by group labs, progress reports, homework, and a .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The , and likely rewarding for students who keep up.

Main concern

Group projects and weekly progress reports drive the experience.

What students said

“His class consisted mostly of 3 big group project labs and a .”
ENGR11
“I could have gotten an A if I had tried in this class.”
ENGR11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove exam policy.

Final ProjectExam Policy Unclear
“His class consisted mostly of 3 big group project labs and a .”
ENGR11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I could have gotten an A if I had tried in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

84/100

“I could have gotten an A if I had tried in this class.”

🧪 Course Structure

76/100

“His class consisted mostly of 3 big group project labs and a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • There is technically a textbook but it's not required.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I could have gotten an A if I had tried in this class.
  • There is weekly progress reports and but they're less important.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is useful but not strongly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR111 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values